Yes, I certainly will do that. I've checked on win-builder and the package
seems to pass, so my examples seem to be in good order.
David
On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 15:17, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 8 December 2018 at 14:41, David Hugh-Jones wrote:
> | Thanks guys. If CRAN already sets FORCE_SUG
On 8 December 2018 at 14:41, David Hugh-Jones wrote:
| Thanks guys. If CRAN already sets FORCE_SUGGESTS = false, then I think I
| don't have a problem.
I think you still do as long as you ignore Duncan's advice. It's not "just"
about skirting CRAN tests and rules, it is about doing packaging ri
Thanks guys. If CRAN already sets FORCE_SUGGESTS = false, then I think I
don't have a problem.
David
On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 14:36, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 08/12/2018 9:28 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
> > Can you just set _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=false?
> >
> > env:
> >global:
> ># don't
On 08/12/2018 9:28 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
Can you just set _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=false?
env:
global:
# don't treat missing suggested packages as error
- _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=false
I am reasonably certain that is what CRAN uses.
Also make sure that examples fail gracefully i
Can you just set _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=false?
env:
global:
# don't treat missing suggested packages as error
- _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=false
I am reasonably certain that is what CRAN uses.
Hadley
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:11 AM David Hugh-Jones
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My package Suggests a
