On 25 October 2019 at 22:45, Mark van der Loo wrote:
| Adding a static PDF vignette is very easy. I have written about it here:
|
http://www.markvanderloo.eu/yaRb/2019/01/11/add-a-static-pdf-vignette-to-an-r-package/
And I am doing just that for more and more packages of mine.
It is "wrong" in
Adding a static PDF vignette is very easy. I have written about it here:
http://www.markvanderloo.eu/yaRb/2019/01/11/add-a-static-pdf-vignette-to-an-r-package/
Best,
Mark
Op vr 25 okt. 2019 13:22 schreef Berry Boessenkool <
berryboessenk...@hotmail.com>:
>
> You could also consider a static vign
You could also consider a static vignette withh R.rsp:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/R.rsp/vignettes/R_packages-Static_PDF_and_HTML_vignettes.pdf
Berry
> The vignettes contain code for simulations which causes the long
> runtime. In examples of the m
On 24/10/2019 7:16 p.m., Helmut Schütz wrote:
Dear Duncan,
Duncan Murdoch wrote on 2019-10-24 21:51:
So it seems clear what to do: remove the BuildVignettes: false
statement, and explain why CRAN should avoid building them in your
submission message. This will likely make it take longer for t
Dear Helmut,
Maybe you can move your vignettes (source and rendered version) to the inst
folder. I think that this makes the files available to the user without
being recompiled. Downside it that they are no longer recognised as
vignettes. Therefore I would also add a short overview vignette descr
Dear Duncan,
Duncan Murdoch wrote on 2019-10-24 21:51:
So it seems clear what to do: remove the BuildVignettes: false
statement, and explain why CRAN should avoid building them in your
submission message. This will likely make it take longer for the
package to be handled; if that's a problem
On 24/10/2019 8:57 a.m., Helmut Schütz wrote:
Dear all, since we have many examples in our vignettes (rendering takes
about 7 minutes) we provide them in /inst/doc Another reason is to have
HTML5 instead of XHTML1.0 produced by pandoc (which contains deprecated
attributes). To prevent building we
