Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

Krylov via R-package-devel Onderwerp: Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)   Dear Pepijn, Thank you for the very detailed email. Part of these 22 days might be explained by CRAN volunteers being on vacations a couple of weeks, until yesterday. I would submit the latest version of the package with the

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

Dear Pepijn, Thank you for the very detailed email. Part of these 22 days might be explained by CRAN volunteers being on vacations a couple of weeks, until yesterday. I would submit the latest version of the package with the improvements you made. Other options require more manual work from CRAN

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

On 17 April 2023 at 20:37, Socorro Dominguez wrote: | Thank you for all the help. | | Here is the GitHub link: | https://github.com/NeotomaDB/neotoma2 Thanks for posting a link to the repo. That should really be a standard. You currently have (and I indent by two spaces for clarity here) De

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

d after the < > tag if that is the end of the > > paragraph/sentences - its is not clear it is there from the snippet that > > you sent. > > (let us know if the package is on github as then we can see the entire > > file) > > > > best, > > Merlise &g

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

adb.org/api-docs/>." as the contents of the field. I added 8 > spaces before " > I hope this helps. > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 9:42 PM Socorro Dominguez > wrote: > >> Thank you for all the help. >> >> Here is the GitHub link: >> https://github.com/NeotomaDB/neo

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

, 2023 8:41 PM > *To:* Sarah Goslee > *Cc:* r-package-devel@r-project.org > *Subject:* Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject) > > Thank you! > > So, based on this link: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://r-pkgs.org/description.html*:*:text=to*20be*20in

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

ackage-devel on behalf of Socorro Dominguez Sent: Monday, April 17, 2023 8:41 PM To: Sarah Goslee Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject) Thank you! So, based on this link: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://r-pkgs.org/description.html*:*:text=to*20be*20inden

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

Thank you! So, based on this link: https://r-pkgs.org/description.html#:~:text=to%20be%20indented%3A-,Description,-%3A%20The%20description I thought I had to add indentations... So, I original

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

Hi, The Writing R Packages manual is the main documentation, specifically: https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-exts.html#The-DESCRIPTION-file As for indentation, don't. Just use a newline. I don't know of any templates, but the source code for many/most packages is on RForge and/or github,

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

You can go to the URL that is at the bottom of every message from this list and search for "unsubscribe" in the page ... On 9/3/21 1:13 PM, Krishan Gupta wrote: Please please stop sending emil to me. i want to not recieve more mails. *

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

Hello, Usually such problems with pkgdown will come from your pkgdown configuration. I see (thanks to a search engine :-) and sorry if my search result is wrong ) that you actually write to exclude all articles * your configuration https://github.com/maRce10/warbleR/blob/7c313bd4388c908df9055a

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

Your documentation files do not match the functions and you have some files R was not expecting. See inline below for more detail On 19/11/2018 10:53, Oloyede Isiaq wrote: I am developing a package in R, but I encountered the below problems, kindly assist. Updating relrisks documentation Lo

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

Have you put dplyr in 'Suggests'? This should do. Note that R CMD check runs the code in vignettes twice - once during building and then again the tangled R code file. So the error may come from the second run. You can check this locally by telling knitr not to clean up after building the vignet

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

That's the issue. My examples are inside a \dontrun{} block 2017-12-05 18:47 GMT+01:00 Iñaki Úcar : > 2017-12-05 18:38 GMT+01:00 Uwe Ligges : > > > > > > On 05.12.2017 18:35, Iñaki Úcar wrote: > >> > >> 2017-12-05 10:04 GMT+01:00 Jose Manuel Vera >: > >>> > >>> Hi all > >>> > >>> Submitted

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

2017-12-05 18:38 GMT+01:00 Uwe Ligges : > > > On 05.12.2017 18:35, Iñaki Úcar wrote: >> >> 2017-12-05 10:04 GMT+01:00 Jose Manuel Vera : >>> >>> Hi all >>> >>> Submitted my package to CRAN but I got some notes I cannot understand. >>> >>> First NOTE is regarding possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRI

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

On 05.12.2017 18:35, Iñaki Úcar wrote: 2017-12-05 10:04 GMT+01:00 Jose Manuel Vera : Hi all Submitted my package to CRAN but I got some notes I cannot understand. First NOTE is regarding possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION. Taken into account that these are not mispelled words (catastr

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

2017-12-05 10:04 GMT+01:00 Jose Manuel Vera : > Hi all > > Submitted my package to CRAN but I got some notes I cannot understand. > > First NOTE is regarding possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION. Taken > into account that these are not mispelled words (catastro is a spanish word > for "Propert

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

On 05.12.2017 10:04, Jose Manuel Vera wrote: Hi all Submitted my package to CRAN but I got some notes I cannot understand. First NOTE is regarding possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION. Taken into account that these are not mispelled words (catastro is a spanish word for "Property registr

Re: [R-pkg-devel] (no subject)

To follow up, I managed to remove the warning by exporting the function directly. In other words, my NAMESPACE now contains both: export("[") exportMethods("[") could someone please confirm it's really the best approach? thanks! -- François On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:57 AM, François Michonn