Re: [R-pkg-devel] rhub (version 2) baulking at building a vignette.

2024-08-03 Thread Rolf Turner
Thanks to Ivan Krylov and Dirk Eddelbuettel who came to my rescue. At first I thought that Dirk's suggestion ("the zero-dependency approach" due to Mark van der Loo) was exactly what I needed. But this turned out not to work; rhub_check() still failed with a complaint about needing pdflatex. I

Re: [R-pkg-devel] rhub (version 2) baulking at building a vignette.

2024-08-02 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 2 August 2024 at 16:12, Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel wrote: | В Fri, 2 Aug 2024 11:10:59 + | Rolf Turner пишет: | | > The advice was to the effect that if the vignette was actually just a | > *.tex file, one could (after putting in some preparatory code, in the | > form of comments,

Re: [R-pkg-devel] rhub (version 2) baulking at building a vignette.

2024-08-02 Thread Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel
В Fri, 2 Aug 2024 11:10:59 + Rolf Turner пишет: > The advice was to the effect that if the vignette was actually just a > *.tex file, one could (after putting in some preparatory code, in the > form of comments, before the documentclass command) pre-process the > file (with pdflatex) and the

[R-pkg-devel] rhub (version 2) baulking at building a vignette.

2024-08-02 Thread Rolf Turner
Some time back, in the mists of memory, I got advice (on this list, I'm pretty sure) about building vignettes. The advice was to the effect that if the vignette was actually just a *.tex file, one could (after putting in some preparatory code, in the form of comments, before the documentclass com