Re: [R-pkg-devel] revdepcheck::revdep_check interpretation problem

2020-02-10 Thread Gábor Csárdi
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 8:24 AM Spencer Graves wrote: [...] > 1. What does the "E: 1" for "gamclass" mean? It sounds > like an error to me, but that contradicts the final message, > "OK: 16, BROKEN: 0". ✓ gamclass 0.58 ── E: 1 | W: 0 | N: 0 means t

Re: [R-pkg-devel] revdepcheck::revdep_check interpretation problem

2020-02-10 Thread Iñaki Ucar
El lun., 10 feb. 2020 9:24, Spencer Graves < spencer.gra...@effectivedefense.org> escribió: > Hello, All: > > >I just ran "revdepcheck::revdep_check" on my development version > of "https://github.com/sbgraves237/Ecdat";; copied below. It ended with > "OK: 16, BROKEN: 0". That sounds goo

[R-pkg-devel] revdepcheck::revdep_check interpretation problem

2020-02-10 Thread Spencer Graves
Hello, All:   I just ran "revdepcheck::revdep_check" on my development version of "https://github.com/sbgraves237/Ecdat";  copied below. It ended with "OK: 16, BROKEN: 0".  That sounds good, except that it also says "gamclass 0.58:  E: 1", so I'm confused.   Two questions: