Thanks very much. In the end I gave up and removed the offending
LaTeX files, as the goal of this was to get the package to build on
r-hub's Fedora platform, and it seems more promising to work with the
r-hub folks to get a sufficiently complete LaTeX installation
available there (as the require
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 9:11 AM Ben Bolker wrote:
>
>
>In the process of trying to get a package to build successfully on
> r-hub's Fedora platform, I had to add a whole bunch of LaTeX .sty files
> to the vignette directory. One of these was collectbox.sty, which
> triggers the NOTE
>
> ---
>
On 13/07/2021 6:40 p.m., Steven Scott wrote:
I'll let others discuss the technical details of how to set up the licence
files. I want to make sure you know that using AGPL is a good way to
ensure that nobody in tech uses your package. Maybe that's intended, but
when I was at Google the ONLY sof
AGPL was chosen by my colleagues. I'll pass on the information.
On 7/13/21 6:40 PM, Steven Scott wrote:
I'll let others discuss the technical details of how to set up the
licence files. I want to make sure you know that using AGPL is a good
way to ensure that nobody in tech uses your packag
I'll let others discuss the technical details of how to set up the licence
files. I want to make sure you know that using AGPL is a good way to
ensure that nobody in tech uses your package. Maybe that's intended, but
when I was at Google the ONLY software we were specifically prohibited from
usin
In the process of trying to get a package to build successfully on
r-hub's Fedora platform, I had to add a whole bunch of LaTeX .sty files
to the vignette directory. One of these was collectbox.sty, which
triggers the NOTE
---
NOTE
The following files contain a license that requires
dist
