Uwe,
As the author of “B” (the psych package) I will submit it once Jonathon
confirms he is ready to submit “A” (the jmv package).
Thanks for the help.
Bill
> On May 2, 2017, at 10:27 AM, Uwe Ligges
> wrote:
>
> Submit B first and write in the submission comments that A will fail but a
Submit B first and write in the submission comments that A will fail but
a version of A is ready to be submitted once B is accepted.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 02.05.2017 06:13, Johannes Ranke wrote:
how does one solve this catch-22?
I see these possibilities
a) reduce the precision of the tes
> how does one solve this catch-22?
I see these possibilities
a) reduce the precision of the tests in A, so the test passes with both
versions of B
b) a submission of both packages at the same time, with a message in the
comments, explaining to CRAN why it is necessary that both are published
hi,
i currently face the following situation:
my package, package A, depends on package B. i have unit tests in
package A which expect results, which are in part as a result of
calculations from package B.
package B has made some changes, which leads to slightly different
results being calc
