Re: [R-pkg-devel] Problem with MathJax in r-release

2025-12-17 Thread Michael Dewey
Thanks guys. I should have updated all the packages first but forgot so I will try that again tomorrow. Michael On 17/12/2025 16:57, Sebastian Meyer wrote: Am 17.12.25 um 17:13 schrieb Deepayan Sarkar: The cause of the problem is clear: If you look at the sources of https://cran.r-project.or

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Problem with MathJax in r-release

2025-12-17 Thread Sebastian Meyer
Am 17.12.25 um 17:13 schrieb Deepayan Sarkar: The cause of the problem is clear: If you look at the sources of https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/metap/refman/metap.html you will see repeated instances of which is invalid HTML. I am not sure where this is coming from, because a recent

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Problem with MathJax in r-release

2025-12-17 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
The cause of the problem is clear: If you look at the sources of https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/metap/refman/metap.html you will see repeated instances of which is invalid HTML. I am not sure where this is coming from, because a recent update to mathjaxr should have fixed this, and \

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Problem with MathJax in r-release

2025-12-17 Thread Michael Dewey
Title should read r-devel. Sorry about that. On 17/12/2025 14:51, Michael Dewey wrote: I use the mathjaxr package to disply the formulae in my package. It has been working for some while including in R 4.2.2. However when I checked a new version of the package (metap) in r-devel I get a Note wh

[R-pkg-devel] Problem with MathJax in r-release

2025-12-17 Thread Michael Dewey
I use the mathjaxr package to disply the formulae in my package. It has been working for some while including in R 4.2.2. However when I checked a new version of the package (metap) in r-devel I get a Note which starts * checking HTML version of manual ... NOTE Found the following HTML validati