On 07/04/2021 10:50 a.m., Andrew Dhawan wrote:
Thank you again Uwe,
So, to clarify - is the error occurring because RankProd is not found in
BioC 3.13 (current release is 3.12)? If so, I'm not sure how I can fix
this...
I suspect the only thing you could do in the short term is to remove
tha
Thank you again Uwe,
So, to clarify - is the error occurring because RankProd is not found in
BioC 3.13 (current release is 3.12)? If so, I'm not sure how I can fix
this...
Thanks
Andrew
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 5:45 AM Uwe Ligges
wrote:
>
>
> On 06.04.2021 19:26, Robert M. Flight wrote:
> > A
On 06.04.2021 19:26, Robert M. Flight wrote:
Andrew,
I think if you want to include a Bioconductor dependency, then I think you
add the "biocViews:" line to your description file to enable bioconductor
Not needed for CRAN.
You simply need to declare the dependency, but BioC 3.13 is what we
Hi Robert,
Thank you for replying! I already had the biocViews: line on my description
file - it seems it must be something else contributing to the issue.
Andrew
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 13:26 Robert M. Flight wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> I think if you want to include a Bioconductor dependency, then I
I had a similar problem with intepreting "notes" in pgirmess checks.
Some are lethal and lead to rejection and some not (just informative
comments). Fortunately Uwe has been kind enough to tell me what I missed
(I thought that all notes were just "informative").
Would it be possible to call leth
Andrew,
I think if you want to include a Bioconductor dependency, then I think you
add the "biocViews:" line to your description file to enable bioconductor
package installation.
See this answer on Bioinformatics stackexchange:
https://bioinformatics.stackexchange.com/a/3375/51
Hope that helps!
Thank you both very kindly - I have addressed both notes. I am still
wondering though about the RankProd dependency error - any insight into
this?
Thanks!
Andrew
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 11:58 AM Uwe Ligges
wrote:
>
>
> On 06.04.2021 17:39, Patrick Giraudoux wrote:
> > I had a similar problem wit
On 06.04.2021 17:39, Patrick Giraudoux wrote:
I had a similar problem with intepreting "notes" in pgirmess checks.
Some are lethal and lead to rejection and some not (just informative
comments). Fortunately Uwe has been kind enough to tell me what I missed
(I thought that all notes were just
Two Notes:
Found the following (possibly) invalid URLs:
URL: http://imagemagick.org/script/download.php (moved to
https://imagemagick.org/script/download.php)
From: inst/doc/vignette.html
Status: 200
Message: OK
Please change http --> https, add trailing slashes, or follow move
Dear all,
I am a bit puzzled by this error for the sigQC package being uploaded to
CRAN. Checks on my end pass without issue. There is one error regarding the
bioConductor dependency RankProd that comes up only on the Debian OS when
checking. See here for further details:
https://win-builder.r-pro
10 matches
Mail list logo
