Re: [R-pkg-devel] NOTE: Examples with CPU time > 2.5 times elapsed time

2023-12-07 Thread Artur Araujo
From: Ivan Krylov Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 22:42 To: Artur Araujo Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org ; Javier Roca Pardi�as ; Lu�s Machado Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] NOTE: Examples with CPU time > 2.5 times elapsed time Dear Artur, You've got a well-written

Re: [R-pkg-devel] NOTE: Examples with CPU time > 2.5 times elapsed time

2023-12-04 Thread Ben Bolker
Wow. On Mon, Dec 4, 2023, 5:43 PM Ivan Krylov wrote: > Dear Artur, > > You've got a well-written package. There are some parts I wasn't able > to understand (e.g. changing the class of a variable by reference using > SET_CLASS and later changing it back), but there are no obvious places > where

Re: [R-pkg-devel] NOTE: Examples with CPU time > 2.5 times elapsed time

2023-12-04 Thread Ivan Krylov
Dear Artur, You've got a well-written package. There are some parts I wasn't able to understand (e.g. changing the class of a variable by reference using SET_CLASS and later changing it back), but there are no obvious places where a mistake could be hiding. On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 23:43:32 + Artur

Re: [R-pkg-devel] NOTE: Examples with CPU time > 2.5 times elapsed time

2023-12-03 Thread Josiah Parry
In these cases, I unfortunately find the best approach to be to wrap the examples in `if (interactive()) ` to ensure that they will not be ran on CRAN tests machines. It hampers the checks of CRAN but it makes it possible to get usable code to users. On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 9:54 AM Artur Araujo wr

[R-pkg-devel] NOTE: Examples with CPU time > 2.5 times elapsed time

2023-12-03 Thread Artur Araujo
Dear R package developers, Package TPmsm is not passing the incoming checks. The following messages appear on 00check.log: * using log directory �/srv/hornik/tmp/CRAN/TPmsm.Rcheck� * using R Under development (unstable) (2023-11-29 r85646) * using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu * R was compiled b