Hi, Thomas.
Since all the Fortran code must talk to R through SEXP's written in C,
wouldn't it make sense to use " C_DOUBLE_COMPLEX" and " C_DOUBLE" to ensure
maximum compatibility?
Thanks,
Avi
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 9:42 AM Thomas Petzoldt <
thomas.petzo...@tu-dresden.de> wrote:
> On 30.08.2
On 30.08.2023 at 11:58 Ivan Krylov wrote:
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 08:43:04 +0200
Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
a) change REAL(kind=8) back to DOUBLE PRECISION that is again old
style. It seems to be portable and is still widely used.
I don't have a reference as good as the Fortran standard, but Steve
L
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 08:43:04 +0200
Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
> a) change REAL(kind=8) back to DOUBLE PRECISION that is again old
> style. It seems to be portable and is still widely used.
I don't have a reference as good as the Fortran standard, but Steve
Lionel said in Dr. Fortran [*] that DOUBLE
I’ve had no issues using the iso_c_binding schema.
Avi
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 30, 2023, at 2:43 AM, Thomas Petzoldt
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> some package maintainers including me got a reminder from Prof. Brian Ripley
> to modernize REAL and INTEGER declarations using the KIND option:
Hi,
some package maintainers including me got a reminder from Prof. Brian
Ripley to modernize REAL and INTEGER declarations using the KIND option:
On 29.08.2023 at 19:31 Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
According to the Fortran standards, numerical values are just an
enumeration, and what e.g. real(k
