On 30/11/2020 11:54 a.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 30/11/2020 11:31 a.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 30 November 2020 at 11:27, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| I think that C++11 isn't a requirement of RcppArmadillo, it's an option
It is as of the 10.* series of Armadillo and hence RcppArmadillo 0.10
On 30 November 2020 at 11:54, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 30/11/2020 11:31 a.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 30 November 2020 at 11:27, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| > | I think that C++11 isn't a requirement of RcppArmadillo, it's an option
| >
| > It is as of the 10.* series of Armadillo and
On 30/11/2020 11:31 a.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 30 November 2020 at 11:27, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| I think that C++11 isn't a requirement of RcppArmadillo, it's an option
It is as of the 10.* series of Armadillo and hence RcppArmadillo 0.10.*
I was going to complain that you should incl
On 30 November 2020 at 11:27, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| I think that C++11 isn't a requirement of RcppArmadillo, it's an option
It is as of the 10.* series of Armadillo and hence RcppArmadillo 0.10.*
Dirk
--
https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
_
On 30 November 2020 at 17:06, Mark Clements wrote:
| [Apologies for cross-posting]
|
| A colleague uses a package I maintain (rstpm2) as a dependency in their
| package (rsimsum) with testing using GitHub Actions. They found that
| testing failed against R versions 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 because recen
I think that C++11 isn't a requirement of RcppArmadillo, it's an option
that is used if available. (Assuming you are using the CRAN version,
not an experimental/devel version.) A user of the header file can include
#define ARMA_USE_CXX11
which would make it a system requirement of whatever p
[Apologies for cross-posting]
A colleague uses a package I maintain (rstpm2) as a dependency in their
package (rsimsum) with testing using GitHub Actions. They found that
testing failed against R versions 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 because recent
versions of RcppArmadillo (which is a dependency in rstpm2)
