> Uwe Ligges
> on Fri, 12 Jun 2015 22:58:17 +0200 writes:
> On 12.06.2015 18:22, Roebuck,Paul L wrote:
>> Actually, between this and other things coming from 'R
>> CMD check' these days, I disagree that this is reasonable
>> at all - it's a hack
> Why a hack? I am
On 12.06.2015 18:22, Roebuck,Paul L wrote:
Actually, between this and other things coming from 'R CMD check' these
days,
I disagree that this is reasonable at all - it's a hack
Why a hack? I am not sure what the right mechanism is, but here the
check is not the problem but it uncovers the pr
Actually, between this and other things coming from 'R CMD check' these
days,
I disagree that this is reasonable at all - it's a hack at best that only
fixes
this particular issue. Better would be to introduce lint-like directives
that
turn off certain R CMD check notes/warnings at different scopes
On 10/06/15 16:12, John Fox wrote:
> Is there any way to suppress the note without removing all.effects()?
Dear John,
I raised this question on the Rd list a couple of months ago and didn't
get an answer (when asking the CRAN maintainers directly they suggested
to rename the functions).
https://
Dear Martin,
Thank you for addressing this issue. Introducing a nonS3method() directive in
NAMESPACE seems a reasonable solution. It could replace export() for functions
with "."s in their names.
Best,
John
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:55:18 +0200
Martin Maechler wrote:
> > John Fox
> >
Dear Martin, dear package developers,
I had a very similar case three days ago in one of our packages. Our aim
was to provide an S3 method matplot.deSolve and an alternative and more
specific non-S3 function matplot.1D because the .1D follows the naming
scheme of other related functions.
The not
> John Fox
> on Wed, 10 Jun 2015 10:12:46 -0400 writes:
> Dear list members,
> One of the packages I maintain, effects, generates the following note in R
> CMD check:
> * checking S3 generic/method consistency ... NOTE
> Found the following apparent S3 methods exp
> John Fox
> on Wed, 10 Jun 2015 10:12:46 -0400 writes:
> Dear list members,
> One of the packages I maintain, effects, generates the following note in R
> CMD check:
> * checking S3 generic/method consistency ... NOTE
> Found the following apparent S3 methods exp
Dear list members,
One of the packages I maintain, effects, generates the following note in R
CMD check:
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... NOTE
Found the following apparent S3 methods exported but not registered:
all.effects
The offending function, all.effect
