specifying the associated package.
— Jenny
On Jul 20, 2015, at 2:05 PM, sbihorel
wrote:
Hi,
Thanks to your suggestions and those of other responders, I was able to get rid
of the warning messages returned during R CMD check.
However I am still confused by the .Rd file-related warnings I get
RAN manual is not clear on this point. Is there a specific syntax
to use to document this types of links?
Thank you again for your time
Sebastien
On 7/15/2015 9:24 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 15/07/2015 9:07 AM, sbihorel wrote:
Hi,
I saw a few recent posts on topics related to mine
15 9:07 AM, sbihorel wrote:
Hi,
I saw a few recent posts on topics related to mine (eg
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2015q3/000238.html). It
looks like I need to import more packages in my NAMESPACE, correct?
However, I thought that imports would be recursive, ie imports would
also ge
dependent packages.
Sebastien
On 7/13/2015 9:42 PM, sbihorel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry about the table. It looked good when displayed using a fixed
> width font. Let me try to linearize it:
>
> * pkgA
> o DESCRIPTION:
> + Depends: methods, lattice, grid, g
build the NAMESPACE file.
>
> HTH
> Seth
>
> On Monday, July 13, 2015, sbihorel <mailto:sebastien.biho...@cognigencorp.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My group has recently upgraded from a fairly old R version (2.12)
> to the
> R version 3.1.2.
Hi,
My group has recently upgraded from a fairly old R version (2.12) to the
R version 3.1.2. In parallel to this upgrade, I am updating our custom
packages to add functionality and also make them compliant to the
requirements of the new version of R. I would like to ask your help with
respect
