Re: [R-pkg-devel] How to resolve help files with \Sexpr{} warning?

2025-04-14 Thread adinno
Dear Iris and Ivan, Together both your comments were very helpful, and both pointed me at a solution to resolve my issue and to explain why this change in behavior emerged, and how my package was triggering the behavior. Solution that worked: Editing the DESCRIPTION file to add the line

[R-pkg-devel] How to resolve help files with \Sexpr{} warning?

2025-04-14 Thread adinno
Dear R Devs, I am unsure how to resolve this NOTE in my package build (I am comfortable with the possibly misspelled words part): Package has help file(s) containing install/render-stage \Sexpr{} expressions but no prebuilt PDF manual. I've dozens of files and no idea which one(s) offen

[R-pkg-devel] Need help with "Lost braces" in R under development checks

2024-04-07 Thread adinno
Hello, I would appreciate help with two build NOTEs: First, On the Winbuilder check, the check for R version 4.4.0 alpha (2024-04-05 r86346 ucrt) and also under the Debian R Under development (unstable) (2024-04-05 r86348) I got a NOTE about a bunch of 'Lost braces' in my .Rd files. I am co