Simply only run the function conditionally in test, examples, vignettes:
if(requireNamespace(packageName)){
example / vignette / test code
}
On 08.05.2025 15:37, Juan Antonio Garcia Martin wrote:
Dear mantainers,
I have a question, since one of my packages currently does not pass the
onS
. those ARM chips used in current M[123]Macs (hence very
relevant topic), do not support long doubles. And compilers offer to
compile without support for long doubles which e.g. CRAN uses to check
in an additional (issues) check.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
As background this was motivated by a quer
Or set a web timeout and if not downloaded succesfully not run the code
(i.e. condiationalize).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 17.04.2025 09:27, Fellinger Tobias wrote:
Dear Emanuele,
I checked one of the Notes. One of the examples of
get.geotop.inpts.keyword.value that throws a NOTE has parts
On 05.04.2025 00:29, Halder,Aritra wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to submit a package to CRAN built using nimble. It generates
warnings like so:
Which package?
: no visible global function definition for 'nimDim'
and you have not forgot to import nlmDim()?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
This is on so far strange as the winbuilder service and the CRAN
incoming check happen actually on the same machine, same library and
same version of R.
If this is not related to some randomness in generating your data,
please simply resubmit.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 06.04.2025 10:08, Chris
See my response in the communication among you and CRAN.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 05.04.2025 08:40, Paul Angelo Manlapaz wrote:
Dear Sir / Ma'am,
Greetings.
I am but a newbie in R Package development and currently, I am trying to
submit my second package to CRAN and every time after submi
x27;
You have to build the package with R-devel or R-prerelease, then the
field will be auto generated in the new form.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 01.04.2025 09:21, 郭广报 wrote:
Dear Uwe Ligges,
The name "Guo" is correctly spelled. Guo is my family name.
If you are fairly ce
(?). Is it an option to
update cmake on the respective test machines? I understand if it's
not-sometimes it makes sense to keep compatibility. I will search for an
alternative then.
Please ask the Mac maintainer, Simon Urbanek.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
https://cran.r-project.org/web/c
terations
- or by running less important tests only conditionally if some
environment variable is set that you only define on your machine?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
ID = "0000-0002-3351-0686")> )
You should build with a recent version of R-dvel whic his also used for
incoming checks on CRAN.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
If I build locally, the release (4.3.2) and development (2025-03-15
r87978 ucrt) versions do differ by the resulting Author DESC
errable, so that the code runs if the requirements are fullfilled
/ suggested packages are available.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
ttps://cran.r-project.org/package=eodhd>
Note that CRAN does not like the idea of retiring a package and
replacing it by another one. This should only be a very exceptional
action and CRAN will decide case based.
Ideally a new version of the old package should do.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Th
ub.docker.com/r/rocker/r-devel-san/> to confirm
that this is fixed before I send it off to CRAN.
Best,
Zhian
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 4:01 AM Iñaki Ucar <mailto:iu...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 12:56, Uwe Ligges mailto:lig...@stati
On 04.02.2025 12:46, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
@Ivan: Excellent anaylsis as always.
@Bernd: So what can **you** do about it? You are using adegenet
correctly as Ivan pointed out, so IMHO CRAN should have requested
adegenet's maintainer to fix this. But since it's your package that is
on the line here,
ows R-release/oldrelease).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
> unless you update the version of your package (or there is an error
caused by another package whose update will fix it), so in most cases
waiting won't fix anything. If there is a problem you have to report it
to the corresponding CRAN main
manuals) that oetherwise would not be executed.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
With regards to the potential bug with R CMD CHECK; I tested this on R
4.4.2 on Mac OS Sonoma and have uploaded a small test script to GitHub
that demonstrates it:
https://gist.github.com/gowerc/248f398f421750f7673019d1989cbe6
Issue found and fixed: someone else submitted some broken survival for
the on demand checks which was stuck in the on demand library.
You should be able to resubmit without issues now.
Best,
Uwe
On 29.01.2025 13:52, Gabriel Constantino Blain wrote:
Dear Dr. Uwe Ligges,
I tried at least 5
Have you tried at least twice? If it persists, please let me know and
forward the message you got from winbuilder.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 28.01.2025 15:47, Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel wrote:
В Tue, 28 Jan 2025 10:01:00 +
Gabriel Constantino Blain пишет:
When I run check_win_devel
Most easily rebuild your package with a recent version of R-devel.
Then these fields will match again.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 24.01.2025 14:02, Thierry Onkelinx wrote:
Dear all,
Can someone elaborate why I'm getting this NOTE on winbuilder? The
difference seems to be in the formatting
We really want to get rid of having compiled code imported during the
installation process. Ideally talk to Tomas Kalibera to get the
libraries you need included in to the next Rtools update.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 11.12.2024 05:23, Satyaprakash Nayak wrote:
Hi r-package-devel
I am working on
atform even before your change, I had let yours pass.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Am I correct in assuming a manual review passed the package (which
hopefully I
did get fully compliant)? Or will I get an eventual "please fix" for
something
clearly outside my scope of action?
As indicated, at
On 12.11.2024 20:25, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 12 November 2024 at 10:47, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 12 November 2024 at 12:40, Pepijn de Vries wrote:
| | "Cannot create temporary file in D:\temp\2024_11_12_ 1_50_00_12637\: No such
file or directory"
|
| Based on your quote and the log
These can be ignored: The websites report "Forbidden" state when the
script asks for headers to verify the URLs are correct.
Not much you can do unless the websites are under your control.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 10.11.2024 06:56, Spencer Graves wrote:
Hello:
I'm getti
ple actually
mean 1.1 instead, but it got manually confirmed and published.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On Tue, Nov 5, 2024, 14:29 Toby Hocking wrote:
I thought that the auto-check robot only accepts submissions which
have Status: OK? (no NOTEs at all)
Is it documented somewhere which NOTEs are a
CRAN does not object to these versioning, the notes are not the reason
for rejection. Who told they are?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 05.11.2024 01:02, Josiah Parry wrote:
Rolf,
The versioning method they’re using is referred to as CalVer
https://calver.org/ (not as catchy as SemVer) and it is
Indeed, thank you, Ivan.
Then it was a temporary hicc up on the build server and should work for
the resubmission of the fixed package.
Best,
Uwe
On 17.10.2024 10:52, Ivan Krylov wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 10:33:33 +0200
Uwe Ligges wrote:
I looked, and farver is not declared in your
d`) ..."
Please use straight rather than directed quotes.
Please fix and resubmit.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 17.10.2024 02:46, Jeff Newmiller via R-package-devel wrote:
You should not use "library(anything)" in a package. You should rely on the Imports:
field in the DESCRIPTION f
A recent issue on CRAN, we are working on fixing it.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 20.09.2024 10:46, 秦 海江 wrote:
Hi All,
I encountered an issue when submitting my R package: the incoming checks did
not report any errors, warnings, or notes, but the submission still did not
pass the incoming checks
hence give labels to
these ids. This is now done automatically when the Author field is
generated from Authors@R by R CMD build, and unfortunately got flagged
by our checks that use a very recent version of R-devel from last night.
In short: Simply submit again, the note will be gon
Dear John,
the question is not really easy to answer, but there is a nice summary
Kurt pointed me to: The code of checkS3methods() includes the following
comments with the last paragraph containing the short answer to your
question:
## Check S3 generics and methods consistency.
## U
A vague recollections tells me this happened when the set of packages
was not fully updated.
Best,
Uwe LIgges
On 02.08.2024 09:39, Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel wrote:
В Thu, 1 Aug 2024 10:53:56 -0400
Ben Bolker пишет:
! Undefined control sequence.
l.176 \hlkwd{library}\hldef
On 20.07.2024 01:52, Rolf Turner wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 10:18:27 +0200
Uwe Ligges wrote:
Not that I know, which queue do you mean?
Apologies for my ignorance but I don't understand the question. I did
not choose a "queue". I simply (as I have always done in the p
Not that I know, which queue do you mean?
Best,
Uwe
On 19.07.2024 00:45, Rolf Turner wrote:
I submitted a package to winbuilder, yesterday. Twice. No response of
any sort. Is the system down, for some reason? Anyone know? Ta.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
ile(s) containing
install/render-stage \Sexpr{} are present (as in this case).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
BuildManual: TRUE
to your DESCRIPTION.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2024, 10:05 Michael Dewey wrote:
Short version
I have recently tried to update two of my CRAN packages and I am getting
the NOTE from
You have
Check: C++ specification, Result: NOTE
Specified C++11: please drop specification unless essential
in your check reuslts and I see no response nor comment why it is.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 12.06.2024 20:12, Lucas Godoy wrote:
Hello everyone,
Recently, my R package {smile} was
Actually none of the reported things led to rejection, but the quote was
not complete, we also see
"The Date field is over a month old."
so please update the Date field and resubmit.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 11.06.2024 14:17, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
I'm not sure what
'StepReg' vignette could use a metadata line to declare strong
vignette dependencies, for example:
%\VignetteDepends{StepReg, BiocStyle, kableExtra}
Indeed, having it listed in Suggests plus the \VignetteDepends
declaration should suffice.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
(I haven't c
s which is apparently different from
the one you are using here.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
rust code. This
was not indicated in your mail, hence you got direct rejection.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks, we see:
Size of tarball: 18099770 bytes
Please reudce to less than 5 MB for a CRAN package.
Best,
Yes, prqlr is a great Rust-based package! My other Rust based packages t
On 18.04.2024 15:48, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 18.04.2024 15:43, Ben Bolker wrote:
To clarify, from an off-list conversation:
AFAICT the chain is
dotwhisker Imports
margins, which Imports
prediction, which Enhances
ffbase (archived in 2022 for 'coerci
ation also pointed out that Enhances is a dependency *in
the opposite direction* -- i.e. if A Enhances B, it's not entirely clear
why the disappearance of B should matter at all ...)
The year old check notes in prediciton matter, not the level of any
dependencies.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
, but CRAN has still not received an update and asked for this each
month this year, so in Jan, Feb, and March without a response, so we
assume prediction is unmaintained. Also, this was escalated to reverse
depends.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 2024-04-18 9:28 a.m., Thierry Onkelinx wrote:
The cascade
Use the URL firld of the package.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 06.04.2024 20:27, Ruff, Sergej wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if its possible to link the toturial site for a package on the
CRAN Cite to the package?
I want to publish the next version of our package.
The CRAN site (https://cran.r
e malicious software directly, I believe.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 02.04.2024 16:05, Jan van der Laan wrote:
Interesting. That would also mean that putting a company repo first does
not protect against dependency confusion attacks (people intentionally
uploading packages with the same name
On 02.04.2024 14:07, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 1 April 2024 at 17:44, Uwe Ligges wrote:
| Untested:
|
| install.packages() calls available.packages() to find out which packages
| are available - and passes a "filters" argument if supplied.
| That can be a user defined filter. It
Untested:
install.packages() calls available.packages() to find out which packages
are available - and passes a "filters" argument if supplied.
That can be a user defined filter. It should be possible to write a user
defined filter which prefers the packages in your local repo.
depends on
Matrix ABI ...
This is only in the on demand check queue (not the daily CRAN repository
checks nor the incoming checks) due to a recently checked Matrix in that
queue (that would be auto-removed soon, but I'll trigger this manually now).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 2024-03-17 4:4
Unfortunately, due to a temporary bug in R-devel, the check result
changed before you looked at it.
Now foxed and back to the older state where the check.log was sufficient
to see the issue.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 11.03.2024 17:09, Maciej Nasinski wrote:
Hey All,
I want to help fix the M1mac
given your mail
message's "From" field ...
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Suggested packages should be used conditionally. If available, use it,
otherwise the code should fail gracefully.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 05.03.2024 11:58, Yohann Foucher wrote:
Dear R-Members,
I just have submitted an update of the ‘survivalSL' package because the last version
depends o
OK, can you pls submit that one to CRAN again?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 04.03.2024 16:53, Christophe Dervieux wrote:
Hi,
yes I have defined in DESCRIPTION
VignetteBuilder:
quarto
and running `tools:::loadVignetteBuilder` on the package source
directory reads it correctly
So you have defined
VignetteBuilder: quarto
??
Best,
Uwe
On 26.02.2024 21:28, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 5:50 PM Christophe Dervieux wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to release a new version of the quarto R package. This new
version is adding support for a new vignette engine tha
There is one Uwe Ligges but > 2 packages.
On 12.02.2024 20:52, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 20 January I submitted a revised version of my eglhmm package, to
CRAN. I very rapidly got an email, emanating from Uwe Ligges' address,
saying:
Dear maintainer,
thanks, package eglhmm_0.1-
Your users may also use old versions of clang. Hence please correct it.
CRAN is also checking with the clang18 release candidate.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 09.02.2024 15:59, Marcin Jurek wrote:
Dear community,
I recently submitted an update to my package. It previous version relied on
Boost for
Dear Naras,
the queues are empty, so everything has been processed.
Which package are you talking about? Then I can take a look what went wrong.
Best,
Uwe
On 01.02.2024 15:53, Balasubramanian Narasimhan wrote:
Just FYI: Winbuilder seems to be unresponsive. My uploads over the last
2 days have
For the BioC installation:
For all CAN work, I simply use install.packages() after adding/setting
the BioC repo/mirror which perfectly well resolves the dependencies.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 30.01.2024 16:56, Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel wrote:
Hello R-package-devel,
What would you
the "cre" role and that's all the
further involvement of the CRAN team with the package (besides the
excellent checks on CRAN)?
Ideally the latter.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
For anyone considering it, I analyzed a bit the situation of XML and
RCurl: https://llrs.dev/post/2023/05/03/cran-
On 24.01.2024 15:59, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 3:51 PM Uwe Ligges
wrote:
Dear package developers,
the CRAN team (and Professor Ripley in particular) has been the defacto
maintainer of CRAN package 'XML'.
Our hope was that maintainers of packages depending o
grate.
I won't spend more time on any discussions. We are just looking for a
volunteer.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Best
Le 24/01/2024 à 15:59, Jeroen Ooms a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 3:51 PM Uwe Ligges
wrote:
Dear package developers,
the CRAN team (and Professor Ripley in particular) ha
still see dozens of strong dependencies on XML.
So we are looking for a person volunteering to take over 'XML'.
Please let us know if you are interested.
For the CRAN team,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz
Others have pointed you to the Additional issue, namely LTO.
But I really cannot resist:
You omitted a line from our message that actually explains it. We wrote:
"Do remember to look at the 'Additional issues'."
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 20.01.2024 20:38, Johann Gaebler wro
, there is no straightforward way to tell the defender about
exceptions. Hence please follow the advice and tell cmake to compile
static libraries instead of executables (an excellent idea, thanks!).
[Microsoft knows about this for several weeks now without action.]
Best,
Uwe Ligges
I am un
Ls that do
not resolve to servers in your part of the world.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
On 13.01.2024 15:01, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Fascinating, now it worked with the latest winbuilder submission 3 times
in a row when I checked it manually. So maybe Ivan was right and there
was a very demanding set of other packages compiling at the same time?
I don't know.
Serge, Can you s
ad to CRAN?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 13.01.2024 14:12, Uwe Ligges wrote:
I can take a look, but not sure if I get to it before monday.
I haven't seen it for any other packages recently.
My suspicion is currently a strange mix of cmd.exe and sh.exe calls. But
this is a very wild guess.
Bes
I can take a look, but not sure if I get to it before monday.
I haven't seen it for any other packages recently.
My suspicion is currently a strange mix of cmd.exe and sh.exe calls. But
this is a very wild guess.
Best,
Uwe
On 13.01.2024 14:08, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 13.01.2024 10:10,
On 13.01.2024 10:10, Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel wrote:
В Fri, 12 Jan 2024 21:19:00 +0100
Serge пишет:
After somme minor midficiations, I make a try on the winbuilder site.
I was able to build the archive with the static library
but I get again a Bad address error. You can have a look to
kages(..., repos=r)
i.e. needs PACKAGES files and sources/binaries in relevant directories
such as
./src (at least)
and ideally also
./bin/windows/contrib/4.2/
./bin/windows/contrib/4.3/
./bin/windows/contrib/4.4/
and similarly for mac.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Regardless, thank you for the feedbac
ay something like
" and if an authorization token is to be extracted on Windows, the
'arcgisbinding' package is needed that can be installed as explained at
<https://r.esri.com>."
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Is there another approach that can be taken here? The one requested
, Depends, LinkingTo).
Users have to choose a non-default setting to include Suggests.
Also note that the maintainer builds the vignette whe calling
R CMD build
CRAN checks whether the vignette can be build.
If a user installs a package, the already produced vignette (on the
maintainers machine by
field of
the DESCRIPTION file (as a comma-separated list of repository URLs) or
for other means of access, described in the ‘Description’ field. "
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 03.01.2024 18:19, Josiah Parry wrote:
Thanks, both. I'm not familiar with Additional_repositories. Must the
pa
On 03.01.2024 17:58, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 03/01/2024 11:33 a.m., Josiah Parry wrote:
I have a scenario where I have an exported function that requires the
installation a package that *is not* available on CRAN. The body of the
function is generally:
fx <- function() {
rlang::check_inst
g::gx()
}
As required, this package is in the Suggests field. But this results in a
note:
checking package dependencies ... NOTE
Package suggested but not available for checking: ‘noncranpkg’
Can this be safely ignored?
Yes.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
[[alternative HTML ve
on to toy examples and wrap
in \donttest{}.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
I haven’t encountered the miktex exception file before but i suspect its a
side effect of a miktex error. Packages should not leave files behind in
the temp directory. If you expect a miktex error you need to remove the
file. If you
code to reproduce...
The third note I am unsure what it means:
* checking for detritus in the temp directory ... NOTE
Found the following files/directories:
'lastMiKTeXException'
This can typically be ignored.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Kind regards
Christiaan
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 15:5
Dear package developers,
reminder as announced on the CRAN web page for some months now:
the CRAN submission queue closes and will be offline from Dec 22 to Jan
8 due to CRAN team vacations and maintainance work on the CRAN check farm.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
This was a temporary hicc up on the machine and we triggered new checks.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 15.12.2023 02:29, Wilke, Claus O wrote:
Hello,
I just tried to submit my package ggridges to CRAN and got an error during the
pretest on Windows. I have no idea what the error means, and my package
p -o fastRand.o /bin/sh: line 1:
/x86_64-w64-mingw32.static.posix/bin/g++: Bad address |
A search indicate that the problem is from the "D:" (not sure it is the correct
answer)
Well, the missing d: or /d/ in the last line of your cited output.
Which package is this? Then I could take
Have you sent a note to the Mac maintainer already?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 04.12.2023 21:52, Jonathan Keane wrote:
Thank you to the CRAN maintainers for maintenance and keeping the all
of the CRAN infrastructure running.
I'm seeing a long delay in builds on CRAN for r-oldrel-macos-x86_64
Thanks for your offer to providing us with capable multicore servers and
support staff for continuing support of recent Fedora systems.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 04.12.2023 18:09, andrew--- via R-package-devel wrote:
I do think that its a reasonable ask that the test machines be running
operating
.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks!
Sharon
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman
,
Uwe Ligges
On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 9:54 AM Rafael Ayala Hernandez <
rafael.ayalahernan...@oist.jp> wrote:
ello,
I have added some functions to read binary files in my asteRisk package.
The binary files that are read contain just arrays of coefficients and
metadata about these.
I would l
ersion of the retired winbuilder severs we kept the same OS
version for almost 10 years.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Best,
Tatsuya
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package
s. Perhaps CRAN
occasionally adjusts its User-Agent to avoid some of these challenges? Not
sure.
Aron
This (status 400) underlies manual inspection and we let this pass.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mai
plain upon submission of axt2axt that paropt is well
prepared for submissions once ast2ast got released.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Thanks a lot in advance.
Best Konrad
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing
est R-devel because of the
settings of my Windows system?
Best, Ulrike
Am 14.11.2023 um 17:16 schrieb Uwe Ligges:
On 14.11.2023 15:45, Ulrike Groemping wrote:
Dear package developers,
I am struggling with an error on R devel (all flavors) that I cannot
reproduce with a freshly installed R-dev
please change this to plotmath as in the instance further above in
your code where you already wrote
titel <- as.expression(bquote("Plot for "*.(xnam)*", "*alpha ==
.(alpha)))
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Calls: halfnormal ... -> plot -> plot.default -> localTitle
t the user choose the filename and otherwise, e.g., in examples, use
tempdir() as a location for writing files.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
I don't know really what this note mean and can I put the package
anyway to Cran?
Best regards,
Karolina
On 01.11.2023 03:51, Mikael Jagan wrote:
Thanks. It seems that we were mistaken in our feeling (IIRC) that it would
be "OK" to implicitly require '--no-manual' on versions of R from 3.5.0 to
4.2.1, not changing our Depends.
We will fix this in Matrix 1.6-2, probably by conditionalizing or ot
It was 0.0-20 that had another issue now explained privately. 0.0-21
passes cleanly.
Best,
Uwe
On 17.10.2023 20:45, Ivan Krylov wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:08:28 +0200
Uwe Ligges wrote:
I do not know which package this refers to, so cannot easily look.
This seems to be about the eglhmm
those examples?
2) If this is the case:
Is it possible to load it only once per CMD check?
Typically it is loaded once for the examples, once for each test file
and once for each vignette that uses it.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Sincerely,
Leonard
__
R
Certainly there was more in the output that caused rejection as the
stuff you describe below seems to be fine.
I do not know which package this refers to, so cannot easily look.
Best,
Uwe
On 16.10.2023 11:25, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Whoops, I just read the next line. Sorry!
On 15/10/2023 9:34
This is under discussion with the CRAN team now.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 11.10.2023 09:06, Tony Wilkes wrote:
Dear all,
I'm trying to publish an R package to CRAN. Their checks come back with 2 NOTES. The first one is
saying that the package is a new submission, and the second one is that
your package (after acceptance) with R versions linked
against OpenBLAS, MKL, ATLAS etc.
Binaries are always linked against Rblas for maximal compatibility.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Best,
--Sameh
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https
made more
efficient, but it does the job.
Or perhaps you simply look for defining a new class (I'd use S3) where
the output is a specific data frame (with some prefedined columns) to
which you assign a class attribute?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
__
R-
ck way to check where things go wrong regarding the
number of cores? It is not easy to find the source of the problems
when there are many examples and tests.
If it is OK on winbuilder but not on Linux, then likely something makes
use of multithreading.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
R
On 14.09.2023 23:35, Leonard Mada wrote:
Dear Uwe,
I found out what is going on. There is an example:
## Write the pdb object in file "Rpdb.pdb" into the current directory
write.pdb(pdb, file = "Rpdb.pdb")
In examples, you should write to tempdir(), if at al
The spellng is fine and not a problem.
For
* checking for non-standard things in the check directory ... NOTE
Found the following files/directories:
‘Rpdb.pdb’
You need to move this to ./inst or a subdirectory or, if data, consider
./extdata See Writing R Extensions.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On
be fine, and no license file unless you want
to add additional restrictions that are permitted by GPL-3 such as
attribution requirements.
No idea what usethis::use_gpl3_license() does.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
* Many examples use `\%in\%` instead of `%in%.
Hopefully, this is fixed now. But it was qui
John can you point us to an example?
Where is it in your package and what is the R CMD check output?
Guess: Within an Rd file you have to escape the % characters otherwise
they start a comment.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 03.09.2023 00:30, Spencer Graves wrote:
I've encountered similar i
1 - 100 of 621 matches
Mail list logo
