;https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
*From:* R-package-devel on
behalf of Ulrike Grömping
*Sent:* Friday, June 27, 2025 1:41:17 AM
*To:* r-package-devel@r-project.org
*Subject:* [R-pkg-devel] data files not found in package checks
Dear package developer
ka.ms/AAb9ysg>
*From:* R-package-devel on
behalf of Ulrike Grömping
*Sent:* Friday, June 27, 2025 1:41:17 AM
*To:* r-package-devel@r-project.org
*Subject:* [R-pkg-devel] data files not found in package checks
Dear package developers, I likel
Dear package developers,
I likely miss something silly, but I fail to find the root cause. I used
to have my package data in sysdata.rda, even though I exported some of
them for the users' direct use. With my new package CAs, I now want to
move those files that are meant both for user informat
Thank you for spotting this, I should have found it myself :-(
I suppose I don't get this error even from latest R-devel because of the
settings of my Windows system?
Best, Ulrike
Am 14.11.2023 um 17:16 schrieb Uwe Ligges:
On 14.11.2023 15:45, Ulrike Groemping wrote:
Dear package developer
Am 02.02.2021 um 22:37 schrieb Duncan Murdoch:
On 02/02/2021 9:13 a.m., Ulrike Grömping wrote:
Am 02.02.2021 um 02:38 schrieb Duncan Murdoch:
On 01/02/2021 5:03 p.m., Ulrike Grömping wrote:
Dear package developeRs,
under the Fedora clang checks, I find the note
"Undeclared packages
Am 02.02.2021 um 02:38 schrieb Duncan Murdoch:
On 01/02/2021 5:03 p.m., Ulrike Grömping wrote:
Dear package developeRs,
under the Fedora clang checks, I find the note
"Undeclared packages ‘FrF2’, ‘DoE.wrapper’, ‘sfsmisc’, ‘DoE.MIParray’,
‘planor’ in Rd xrefs"
for my package D
Dear package developeRs,
under the Fedora clang checks, I find the note
"Undeclared packages ‘FrF2’, ‘DoE.wrapper’, ‘sfsmisc’, ‘DoE.MIParray’,
‘planor’ in Rd xrefs"
for my package DoE.base. I understand that package planor has been
archived from CRAN; I don't understand what is wrong with th
ant
7526 Meadow Green St.
San Antonio, TX 78251
mobile: 210-218-2868
rmsh...@me.com
On May 9, 2019, at 12:45 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/05/2019 12:43 p.m., Ulrike Grömping wrote:
Hmmmh, but does that also apply if the sample.kind has been set to the
old version? I.e., would
if (g
Hmmmh, but does that also apply if the sample.kind has been set to the
old version? I.e., would
if (getRversion()>="3.6.0") RNGkind(sample.kind="Rounding")
val <- 10
set.seed(val)
discard <- sample(1000, 100)
rnorm(36)
produce the same normal random numbers in 3.5.3 and 3.6.0? I would have
exp
Dear R package authors,
I am currently struggling with differences in test results between R
versions 3.5.3 and 3.6.0: There are expected ones (from the new behavior
of sample(), which can be switched off by
RNGkind(sample.kind="Rounding")) and unexpected ones: The normal random
numbers from
10 matches
Mail list logo
