t; Add MASS as Suggests or Imports should be enough.
> If you point to where your code is on GitHub or another public-facing
> repository it is easier to help more specifically.
>
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025, 7:57 PM Richard M. Heiberger wrote:
> I don't understand what this mess
I don't understand what this message means
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc
Check: for unstated dependencies in 'demo', Result: NOTE
'library' or 'require' call not declared from: 'MASS'
it is coming from HH_3.1-53.tar.gz that I sent in this evening.
It is also visible for HH_3.1-52.tar.g
t;tidy --version")
HTML Tidy for Apple macOS version 5.8.0
> On May 19, 2024, at 01:30, Ivan Krylov wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 May 2024 21:10:18 +
> "Richard M. Heiberger" wrote:
>
>> when checking a package and discovering these messages about html5,
>>
n't think that will ever happen. It only happens when a user tries an
> "--as-cran" check, but doesn't have a current version of tidy installed.
> CRAN does have the up-to-date versions installed, so they won't see this.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
>> On 20
this is a suggestion to CRAN.
when checking a package and discovering these messages about html5, can you
generate an informational message about tidy with a link to updating tidy?
thank you
Rich
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 17, 2024, at 15:32, Marc Girondot via R-package-devel
> wrote:
>
>
this looks like a relative of the issue I tripped on that is discussed in the
email threads
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2024q1/010531.html
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2024-March/083259.html
At issue is the default export of
exportPattern(".")
System generated nam
quot;) ?
> On Mar 6, 2024, at 11:57, Joshua Ulrich wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 1:03 AM Richard M. Heiberger wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Duncan, Jeff, Ivan.
>>
>> I did all that Duncan and Jeff suggested, plus a bit more that appeared to
>> be necessary.
&g
n the NEWS file, perhaps augmented with Ivan's
comments,
might be added to utils/man/globalVariables.Rd and to the
"
section ‘Package
structure’ in the ‘Writing R Extensions’ manual.
"
> On Mar 6, 2024, at 01:38, Ivan Krylov wrote:
>
> В Tue, 5 Mar 2024 22:41:32 +
&g
and _ are explicitly included.
What should I try next?
> On Mar 5, 2024, at 18:21, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 05/03/2024 5:41 p.m., Richard M. Heiberger wrote:
>> My package is being rejected by auto-check
>> Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-
My package is being rejected by auto-check
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64
Check: for missing documentation entries, Result: WARNING
Undocumented code objects:
'.__global__'
All user-level objects in a package should have documentation entries.
See chapter 'Wr
Why are these functins in two different packages?
On the surface it looks like qrcode is a transformation function and opencv is
its inverse.
> On Nov 7, 2023, at 14:55, Thierry Onkelinx wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> The qrcode package converts text into a qrcode image. The opencv package is
> able t
I have a demo file that uses a function defined in the package.
when I force the demo to be run with
R CMD check --test-dir=demo findme_1.0.tar.gz
then the function defined in the package is not recognized.
Here is the demo/findme.r file:
findme::findme()
findme()
Here is the result of:
R CMD
There is a new NOTE. This line with \& used to be acceptable.
I am not seeing what the suggested replacement is.
* checking Rd files ... [4s] NOTE
checkRd: (-1) bivariateNormal.Rd:42: Escaped LaTeX specials: \&
The full example is
\note{
Based on the \code{galaxy} example on pages 204--205 in
I am responding to a subset of what you asked. There are packages which use
multiple formulas
in their argument sequence.
What you have as a single formula with | as a separator
q | p | subject | time | rho ~ p + x + y | p + w + y | z + y
I think would be better as a comma-separated list of fo
> One more question. If I use mjeqn at the beginning of a paragraph it
> automatically sets a line break afterwards.
> Any idea what I can do to prevent this?
follow it with
\vspace*{1ex}
to back up one line.
Rich
> On Jun 25, 2021, at 07:51, Marc Scherstjanoi
> wrote:
>
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
Is it perhaps an https:// address? You browser will make the
adjustment. CRAN will give this message.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:08 PM jared_wood wrote:
>
> I write an URL of MalaCards (a database) in my description, because I need
> the data in this database. However, there is an error here a
I would guess that your NAMESPACE file doesn't export dnormfun.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 1:38 PM Weimin Zhang wrote:
>
> Thank you Max.
>
> The reason I used the super assignment "<<-" is because the "dnormfun"
> function later called by function kronecker(X, Y, FUN = "*",...) through
> FUN="
generated a .tex file for a table:
>
>
>
> \begin{table}[!tbp]
>
> \begin{center}
>
> \begin{tabular}{l}
>
> \hline\hline
>
> \multicolumn{1}{c}{}\tabularnewline
>
> \hline
>
> ~\tabularnewline
>
> a\tabularnewline
>
> b\tabularnewline
>
&
Please be consistent with the latex() function in the Hmisc package. For
example, for an array x, latex (x) produces a complete latex table
environment. See the ?latex helpfile for details.
Rich
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:07 wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I'm working on a function in a package that
un is from the previous
> version 3.1-37 which is on CRAN. I installed the old version
> indirectly when I installed microplot before running check.
>
> I've only seen this on Windows in R-devel when running --as-cran. It
> doesn't happen in R-devel on MacOS with or without
think
of something else to try.
Rich
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 4:58 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 08/12/2019 3:14 p.m., Richard M. Heiberger wrote:
> > I am seeing this in
> >> version
> > _
> > platform x86_64-w64-mingw32
> > a
I am seeing this in
> version
_
platform x86_64-w64-mingw32
arch x86_64
os mingw32
system x86_64, mingw32
status Under development (unstable)
major 4
minor 0.0
year 2019
month 12
day05
svn re
Does this solve the problem?
if (getRversion() >= '2.15.1')
globalVariables(c('envroot'))
I keep this in file R/globals.R
I learned of this from John Fox's use in Rcmdr.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 8:28 PM, J C Nash wrote:
> In order to track progress of a variety of rootfinding or optimization
Sounds like a missing "}".
Which could mean the brace is inside quotes or following a "%"
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 09:17 michael tsagris via R-package-devel <
r-package-devel@r-project.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: michael tsagris
> To: "r-package-devel@r-proj
Your quote symbols are certainly getting in the way.
try basing your next version on something like this,
where the items in the list named tmp are actual functions, not
character strings.
> tmp <- list(prob=pnorm, quantile=qnorm)
> tmp$prob(1.96)
[1] 0.9750021
> tmp$quantile(.975)
[1] 1.959964
I copied the 3.3.3 gmp_0.5-13.1 over to 3.4.0 and it works.
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Andy Bunn wrote:
> Hi all, I package I maintain imports gmp:
>
> https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gmp
>
>
>
> There is no binary OS X El Capitan binary for gmp and attempts to build it
> from source on
I think this is related to the difficulty I wrote about last week.
This example is with last night's development build and uses only
R-core provided code.
I don't understand this Error message
Error in get(f, envir = code_env) : object '[<-.ts' not found
when I can display the object stats:::`[<
x27;t see inside namespaces.
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 28/05/2015 9:19 AM, Richard M. Heiberger wrote:
>>
>> I posted a package
>> trivial_3.1-18.tar.gz
>> and the
>> 00check-trivial.log
>> from R-devel at
>>
I posted a package
trivial_3.1-18.tar.gz
and the
00check-trivial.log
from R-devel at
http://astro.temple.edu/~rmh/HH-test/
The package contains one function
trivial <- function(...) {}
and a NAMESPACE that imports other packages.
The 00check-trivial.log has many messages that look l
epend or import or suggest.
Thanks
Rich
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Uwe Ligges
wrote:
>
>
> On 25.05.2015 19:28, Richard M. Heiberger wrote:
>>
>> I will send it. what is the best way? direct to you? posting it on my
>> website?
>
>
> Website so other
> file?
>
>
> 2. If you still get the other problems, please make a version of your
> package available so that someone else can check and debug this.
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
>
>
>
>
> On 25.05.2015 05:01, Richard M. Heiberger wrote:
>>
>> The p
recent version of R-devel with all relevant packages you
> depend on re-installed?
>
> Looks like either a bug in that months old version of R-devel or an
> inconsistancy of installed packages and the version of the methods package
> or so.
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
>
&
32 matches
Mail list logo
