ul 27, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 26/07/2017 12:23 PM, Phil Chalmers wrote:
>
>> Yes, I can see the partial.rdb file in the list, also in entry 28. So I
>> believe the problem is on the CRAN build.
>>
>
> For the rest of the list: This claim
Yes, I can see the partial.rdb file in the list, also in entry 28. So I
believe the problem is on the CRAN build.
Phil
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 26/07/2017 9:05 AM, Phil Chalmers wrote:
>
>> Hi Duncan,
>>
>> I use the standard R C
)
* using session charset: ISO8859-1
* using option '--as-cran'
* checking for file 'mirtCAT/DESCRIPTION' ... OK
* checking extension type ... Package
* this is package 'mirtCAT' version '1.6'
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... Note_to_CRAN_maintain
would look
> into that first. Maybe it's a matter of a missing dependency (e.g. one of
> the base packages), maybe you need to add an extra file to your package
> when you use macros. But it still doesn't explain why the error doesn't
> appear on all/most platforms...
>
>
Hi all,
First time posting here, so hopefully I'm following the correct etiquette.
I recently received the error:
"Package has help file(s) containing build-stage \Sexpr{} expressions but
no 'build/partial.rdb' file."
when submitting a package to CRAN (source code: https://github.com/
philchalm
