Re: [R-pkg-devel] RTools 4.x Perl Incompatibility with WriteXLS CRAN Package

2024-07-19 Thread Marc Schwartz
...@disroot.org>> Date: Friday, July 19, 2024 at 11:18 AM To: Marc Schwartz mailto:marc_schwa...@me.com>> Cc: mailto:r-package-devel@r-project.org>> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] RTools 4.x Perl Incompatibility with WriteXLS CRAN Package Dear Marc Schwartz, В Fri, 19 Jul 2024 10:49:31 -

[R-pkg-devel] RTools 4.x Perl Incompatibility with WriteXLS CRAN Package

2024-07-19 Thread Marc Schwartz
quot;C:\\Strawberry\\perl\\bin\\perl") > > WriteXLS(iris, "test.xlsx", perl = "C:/Strawberry/perl/bin/perl") > Thus, I am confused as to the source of the incompatibility, and may be missing some nuances regarding the Perl binary and related components in RTool

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Licenses

2020-10-23 Thread Marc Schwartz
annot strictly depend on a package/software > that is non-FOSS. Obviously, the FOSS package cannot be used under its own > license conditions in that case. > > Best, > Uwe Ligges > > > > > On 23.10.2020 14:25, Ege Rubak wrote: >> Hi all, >> My two cent

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Licenses

2020-10-23 Thread Marc Schwartz
> On Oct 23, 2020, at 8:25 AM, Ege Rubak wrote: > > Hi all, > > My two cents are below Marc's summary here: > > On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 20:33 -0400, Marc Schwartz wrote: >> Right now, the interpretation, without further clarification from >> CRAN, would be

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Delays in CRAN Windows Binaries?

2020-10-23 Thread Marc Schwartz
after a source package publication should > be less then 72 hours ideally. > > Best, > Uwe > > On 23.10.2020 14:05, Marc Schwartz wrote: >> Hi All, >> Just a quick note to indicate that one of the two Windows binaries for the >> package appeared overnight (EDT)

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Delays in CRAN Windows Binaries?

2020-10-23 Thread Marc Schwartz
Hi All, Just a quick note to indicate that one of the two Windows binaries for the package appeared overnight (EDT). Not sure if this experience is representative for others, or just a temporary bump in the road. Regards, Marc > On Oct 21, 2020, at 2:08 PM, Marc Schwartz wrote: > &g

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Licenses

2020-10-22 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Oct 22, 2020, at 3:47 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > > On 22/10/2020 12:56 p.m., Marc Schwartz wrote: >>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 12:12 PM, Duncan Murdoch >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 22/10/2020 11:55 a.m., Marc Schwartz wrote: >>>>> On Oct 22,

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Licenses

2020-10-22 Thread Marc Schwartz
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 12:12 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > > On 22/10/2020 11:55 a.m., Marc Schwartz wrote: >>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:21 AM, Kevin R. Coombes >>> wrote: >>>>

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Licenses

2020-10-22 Thread Marc Schwartz
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote: > > On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:21 AM, Kevin R. Coombes > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am developing a package and getting a NOTE from R CMD check about licenses >> and ultimate dependencies on a res

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Licenses

2020-10-22 Thread Marc Schwartz
, ‘Imports’ or ‘LinkingTo’ fields) directly or indirectly a package or external software which restricts users or usage." Thus, you would seem to need to make a decision on hosting your package on CRAN, but without the need to import from flowCore/cytolib, or consider hosting your package

[R-pkg-devel] Delays in CRAN Windows Binaries?

2020-10-21 Thread Marc Schwartz
binaries are the only outstanding updates pending. Thanks! Marc Schwartz __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Internet security software?

2020-02-24 Thread Marc Schwartz
due to security", a paradigm that I learned back in the 90s in an apropos setting, I long ago disabled the Safe Files feature in BitDefender, and have not had an issue since. I am going to presume that the behavior on Windows is going to be similar.

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Exited with status -1073741819.

2017-11-29 Thread Marc Schwartz
Rampal, One additional thought here. Since you reference RTools in your initial post, I presume that this is occurring on Windows, though not sure which version. Have you tried to build the package using the WinBuilder site provided by Uwe? If not, go here: https://win-builder.r-project.org

Re: [R-pkg-devel] UseR! Session: Navigating the jungle of R packages.

2017-02-10 Thread Marc Schwartz
of http://www.rseek.org, which does have a tab for 'packages' on the results page when doing keyword searches. rseek.org is my first resource when searching for functionality in packages or posts to the lists. Regards, Marc Schwartz > On Feb 10, 2017, at 4:26 PM, Jim Lemon wrote:

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Are import-export-only packages allowed on CRAN?

2015-07-06 Thread Marc Schwartz
cated in R 2.10.0 and put into defunct status in R 2.11.0. That is from the NEWS file: https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/doc/NEWS.2 There is no longer any reference to them in R-Exts. Greg’s “gregmisc” bundle is no longer active on CRAN, in deference to using his component packages direc

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Questions for writing a package

2015-06-11 Thread Marc Schwartz
security risk if they are of the appropriate architecture. R CMD check will warn about them4 unless they are listed (one filepath per line) in a file BinaryFiles at the top level of the package. Note that CRAN will not accept submissions containing binary files even i