pts = options()
print(opts$digits.secs)
on.exit(options(opts))
options(digits.secs = 3)
}
getOption("digits.secs")
#> NULL
noset()
#> NULL
getOption("digits.secs")
#> [1] 3
John Muschelli, PhD
Associate Research Professor
Department of Biostatistics
Johns
I'm submitting a package that uses ffmpeg, which I found out the CRAN
windows build has available (after submitting to win-builder and CRAN). I
was unaware this was available (or which version). Please see (
https://win-builder.r-project.org/V3WjxbzIOQQ2/00check.log) for example,
which gives
Wa
/06/2019 5:52 p.m., John Muschelli wrote:
> > So a single email is not a mailing list and it's a research group, so not
> > really a corporate entity. I don't see WHY explicitly this isn't
> allowed.
> > I understand that this decision has been made with a lot of t
ous people
> of research groups reponded with non coordinated answers. Hence the
> decision was made that we only want to talk to a dedicated maintainer
> who is responsible for the submission. And we want to know who that is.
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
>
>
> On 25.06.2019 23
e it should be a *person*, not a mailing list and not a
> corporate entity
>
> Best,
> Max
>
> On Jun 25, 2019 3:45 PM, John Muschelli wrote:
> Dear Package Devs,
> Does anyone have any thoughts on whether a maintainer can be an
> organization/group instead of a person for
Dear Package Devs,
Does anyone have any thoughts on whether a maintainer can be an
organization/group instead of a person for CRAN? I don't see there being
an issue as long as the "maintainer" is responsive and fixes issues. Just
figured I'd ask before trying this for some packages.
Best,
John
