Dear Jose,
On 2024-12-18 10:26 a.m., John Fox wrote:
Caution: External email.
Dear Jose,
Assuming that you can fix the bugs in the original function, one
approach would be to make myfun() generic, say myfun <- function(y, ...)
UseMethod("myfun"), with the (fixed) original m
up a call to
the default method. Then existing code wouldn't break and users would
have the option of using a formula.
I hope this helps,
John
--
John Fox, Professor Emeritus
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
web: https://www.john-fox.ca/
--
On 2024-12-17 4:00 p.m., Jose Barrera-
; (see above).
> ## However, if GEN is exported then likely all GEN.CLS functions
> ## should be registered as S3 methods.
> Best wishes,
> Uwe
Excellent! Thank you, Uwe, for digging this out.
I'd also had answered to John Fox (even more strongly)
that it *must* r
hods in
packages are verboten. Perhaps [1] will shed some light?
[1] https://blog.r-project.org/2019/08/19/s3-method-lookup/
On September 4, 2024 11:21:22 AM PDT, Toby Hocking wrote:
I got this warning too, so I filed an issue to ask
https://github.com/r-lib/roxygen2/issues/1654
On Mon, Sep 2, 2
kage.
On 2024-09-02 11:34 a.m., John Fox wrote:
Caution: External email.
Dear R-package-devel list members,
I want to introduce several unregistered S3 methods into the cv package
(code at <https://github.com/gmonette/cv>). These methods have the form
coef.merMod <- function(
e or relevant information would be appreciated.
Thank you,
John
--
John Fox, Professor Emeritus
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
web: https://www.john-fox.ca/
--
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
uot; in the
post) to make sure the "real" source files are ignored when building
the vignettes.
Perhaps this is also a feasible solution for long running vignettes?
Regards,
Shu Fai
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 6:51 AM John Fox wrote:
Dear John,
Unless I'm mistaken, the *installatio
if they declared.
|
| Cheers,
| Simon
|
|
| > On 18/10/2023, at 3:02 AM, John Fox wrote:
| >
| > Hello Dirk,
| >
| > Thank you (and Kevin and John) for addressing my questions.
| >
| > No one directly answered my first question, however, which was whether
the approach that I sug
Hello Duncan,
On 2023-10-17 4:43 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Caution: External email.
On 17/10/2023 4:21 p.m., John Fox wrote:
Hello Simon,
On 2023-10-17 3:51 p.m., Simon Urbanek wrote:
Caution: External email.
John,
the short answer is it won't work (it defeats the purpose of vign
nning vignettes if they declared.
I assume that we'd declare the long-running vignette in our submission
note to CRAN. Maybe that's better than pre-building the HTML vignettes
in the package.
Best,
John
Cheers,
Simon
On 18/10/2023, at 3:02 AM, John Fox wrote:
Hello Dirk,
n Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:45 PM John Fox wrote:
Hello Dirk,
Thank you for the additional information.
As you suggest, what you did to distribute pre-built PDF vignettes is
quite similar to what R.rsp does, except that the latter also supports
pre-built HTML vignettes, which is what I'd
l email.
John,
On 17 October 2023 at 10:02, John Fox wrote:
| Hello Dirk,
|
| Thank you (and Kevin and John) for addressing my questions.
|
| No one directly answered my first question, however, which was whether
| the approach that I suggested would work. I guess that the implication
| is that i
Hello Dirk,
Thank you (and Kevin and John) for addressing my questions.
No one directly answered my first question, however, which was whether
the approach that I suggested would work. I guess that the implication
is that it won't, but it would be nice to confirm that before I try
something e
Hi Michael,
I'm no license expert either, but I too believe that while a
GPL-licensed package can incorporate MIT-licensed code, an MIT-licensed
package can't incorporate GPL-licensed code.
One solution, I think, would be to put your use_data_doc() in a separate
GPL-licensed package, which t
eems inelegant.
You'll also need to add a couple of roxygen tags:
#' @export
#' @rdname myfn
thefn <- myfn
Hadley
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
--
J
s suggestion is
off-base.
Best,
John
On 2022-08-13 9:41 a.m., J C Nash wrote:
Thanks to John Fox and Noah Greifer. Both their approaches resolved my
immediate
problem.
That is, to provide a summary of the fix of my example code,
tw <- function(formula, data, start, control, trace, weigh
pe this helps,
John
John Fox, Professor Emeritus
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
web: https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/
On 2020-12-12 1:40 p.m., Michael L Friendly wrote:
Thanks, Dirk
Just to clarify--
In my packages, candisc, heplots, vcdExtra I have mostly 2D graphic m
e", which does nothing. I don't know what quality CRAN uses,
but for me setting the environment variable GS_QUALITY=screen made a big
difference.
Duncan Murdoch
On 08/10/2020 11:10 a.m., John Fox wrote:
Dear Ben,
Actually, what I used was --compact-vignettes="both", wit
it wants at least a 10% and 10K reduction.
But Ben's example met those criteria. When I trick it into accepting
the compaction, it does put the compacted PDF into the tarball.
Duncan Murdoch
On 07/10/2020 6:03 p.m., John Fox wrote:
Dear Ben,
On 2020-10-07 5:26 p.m., Ben Bolker wrote:
I
agree that it would be nice to
avoid them. After all, what is the --compact-vignettes argument for?
Best,
John
cheers
Ben
On 10/7/20 4:10 PM, John Fox wrote:
Dear Ben,
I was hoping that someone would pick up on this problem, because I've
experienced the same issue of --co
Dear Ben,
I was hoping that someone would pick up on this problem, because I've
experienced the same issue of --compact-vignettes apparently ignored,
e.g., with the Rcmdr package under R 4.0.2 on both macOS and Windows.
Best,
John
John Fox, Professor Emeritus
McMaster University
Ham
t;http://www.DustinTracy.com>
*From:* R-package-devel on
behalf of John Fox
*Sent:* Thursday, August 27, 2020 11:39 AM
*To:* Duncan Murdoch ;
r-package-devel@r-project.org
*Subject:* Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD check "una
e; it appears to want
etc/UTC instead. The second one is offline.
Duncan Murdoch
If both of those fail, you'll get the message you saw.
On 27/08/2020 1:23 p.m., John Fox wrote:
Dear r-package-devel list members,
I got the following note when checking two different packages today
--as-cran, bo
2019q1/003577.html>.
Both packages that I was checking are close to CRAN releases and so I'd
like to know whether I can disregard the note.
Any help would be appreciated.
John
--
John Fox, Professor Emeritus
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
web: https://socia
ginal Message-
> From: R-package-devel [mailto:r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On
> Behalf Of John Fox
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:16 PM
> To: r-package-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: [R-pkg-devel] recursive dependencies and install.packages()
>
> Dear list memb
; ggplot2, which I believe will cause ggplot2 to be installed when
the Rcmdr package is installed, since the recursive dependency would then be
two deep, which apparently works. Is that a reasonable solution? (It seems
like a kludge to me.)
Thanks for any help,
John
---
Dear Duncan,
Thank you for tracking down the source of this error.
Best,
John
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 07:22:21 -0400
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 13/07/2015 9:42 PM, John Fox wrote:
> > Dear Duncan,
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:00:02 -0400
> > Duncan Murdoch wrote:
utils
with value . . .
Best,
John
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:00:02 -0400
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 13/07/2015 7:35 PM, John Fox wrote:
> > Dear Duncan,
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.dun...@gmail.com]
> >> S
Dear Duncan,
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:00:02 -0400
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 13/07/2015 7:35 PM, John Fox wrote:
> > Dear Duncan,
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.dun...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: July-13-15
Dear Duncan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.dun...@gmail.com]
> Sent: July-13-15 7:01 PM
> To: John Fox; 'peter dalgaard'
> Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] "invalid 'envir' argument&qu
alid 'envir' argument
The envir argument to data() defaults to .GlobaEnv .
I hope this helps,
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.dun...@gmail.com]
> Sent: July-13-15 6:32 PM
> To: John Fox; 'peter dalgaard'
> Cc: r-package-de
Dear Peter,
> -Original Message-
> From: peter dalgaard [mailto:pda...@gmail.com]
> Sent: July-13-15 4:52 PM
> To: John Fox
> Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] "invalid 'envir' argument" note from R-devel
>
>
else doItAndPrint(paste('help("', dsnameValue, '",
package="', package, '")', sep=""))
}
OKCancelHelp(helpSubject="data")
dataHelpButton <- buttonRcmdr(top, text=gettextRcmdr("Help on
selected data set"),
Dear Martin,
Thank you for addressing this issue. Introducing a nonS3method() directive in
NAMESPACE seems a reasonable solution. It could replace export() for functions
with "."s in their names.
Best,
John
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:55:18 +0200
Martin Maechler wrote:
> &
function (...)
{
.Deprecated("allEffects")
allEffects(...)
}
Thanks,
John
-------
John Fox, Professor
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast
35 matches
Mail list logo
