Hi Mark,
The cpp11 package is now maintained by Davis Vaughan and we will release a
new version once the C API status is a little cleaner. This warnings
generated from cpp11 will not interfere with your ability to submit your
package; just let CRAN know that the warnings are coming from cpp11.
Ha
Do you have a pointer to the roxygen2 comments that you're using?
Hadley
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 5:38 AM Ruff, Sergej
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need help with a package I am currently developing called bootGSEA.
> I noticed that when I try ‘?bootGSEA’ it goes to the help page in R
> itself but not t
nstalled(package, "as it's used in the reference
> index.")
> 35. base::stop(cnd)
> 36. (function (cnd) …
> 37. cli::cli_abort(message, location = i, name = name, parent = cnd, …
> 38. | rlang::abort(message, ..., call = call, use_cli_format = TRUE, …
> 39. | rlang:
This bug is fixed in the dev version (I don’t remember off the top of my
head in which of pkgdown and roxygen2 you need but it might be both). I’m
planning CRAN updates for both in the near future.
Hadley
On Thursday, January 4, 2024, Daniel Kelley wrote:
> # Question
>
> Is there an online exa
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 2:01 AM Leonard Mada via R-package-devel
wrote:
>
> Dear List-Members,
>
> There are no errors/warnings/notes when I run the check:
>
> ── R CMD check results
> Rpdb 2.3.3
> Duration: 2m 50.1s
>
> 0 errors ✔ | 0
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 6:02 AM Leonard Mada via R-package-devel
wrote:
>
> Dear Members,
>
> I would like to reanimate the archived package Rpdb:
> https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rpdb/index.html
>
> 1.) I have tried to contact the original author by email, but got no
> response.
>
> 2.) N
If you're using one of the licenses supported by usethis
(https://usethis.r-lib.org/reference/licenses.html), you can just call
the appropriate function and it will do all the setup required to be
both CRAN and GitHub compatible.
Hadley
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 10:10 AM Emanuele Cordano
wrote:
>
>
> > If CRAN cannot trust even the official one of Rust, why does CRAN have Rust
> > at all?
> >
>
> I don't see the connection - if you downloaded something in the past it
> doesn't mean you will be able to do so in the future. And CRAN has Rust
> because it sounded like a good idea to allow pac
> > it is not expected to use cargo to resolve them from random (possibly
> inaccessible) places
>
> Yes, I agree with you. So, I suggested the possibility of forbidding the
> Git dependency. Or, do you call crates.io, Rust's official repository,
> "random places"? If CRAN cannot trust even the off
If it's internal only, you could change the name to levels_no()?
Hadley
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 7:28 AM Ulrike Groemping
wrote:
>
> Thanks, Duncan. I appreciate the view that levels.no acts as an S3
> method for the generic levels, if an object of class "no" is handed to
> it. However, as the func
IMO those functions are so small that you don't need to call them out
in your DESCRIPTION. Just note in a nearby comment where they came
from.
Hadley
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 3:21 AM David Hugh-Jones
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> One of my packages copy-pasted some small functions (stuff like `%||%` for
> is
Just submit your package, and you'll get an automated email to the old address.
Hadley
On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 7:14 AM Andrew Simmons wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm changing my name and my email address. I've got an update I'd like to
> submit to CRAN, I've changed my name and email in my DESCRIPTION.
I’d suggest resubmitting, after ensuring that R CMD check runs without any
notes, warnings, or errors.
Hadley
On Monday, October 10, 2022, Diego Hernangómez Herrero <
diego.hernangomezherr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I have some doubts on how to proceed in this case. I am the developer of
>
On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 9:31 PM Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>
> ... which is why tidyverse functions and Python datetime handling irk me so
> much.
>
> Is tidyverse time handling intrinsically broken? They have a standard
> practice of reading time as UTC and then using force_tz to fix the "mistake".
Yes, we will make sure that this is fixed ASAP. There is no need to worry.
Hadley
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 7:32 AM John Harrold wrote:
>
> Howdy Folks,
>
> I got a message from CRAN today telling me that I have a strong reverse
> dependency on the isoband package. But I'm not alone! It look like m
In my experience this NOTE does not interfere with CRAN submission and you
can ignore it.
Hadley
On Monday, September 19, 2022, Igor L wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm testing my package with the devtools::check() function and I got a
> warning about found non-ASCII strings.
>
> These characte
d base::apply instead of plyr::aaply.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Hadley Wickham
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 11:48 AM
> To: Lenth, Russell V
> Cc: Jeff Newmiller ; r-package-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] [External] Re: What is a "reti
> But for the broader question, Jeff is saying that there really are 700
> packages that are in potential trouble!
I think that's rather an overstatement of the problem — there's
nothing wrong with plyr; it's just no longer under active development.
If anything, plyr is one of the safest packages
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 9:11 AM Ben Bolker wrote:
>
>
>In the process of trying to get a package to build successfully on
> r-hub's Fedora platform, I had to add a whole bunch of LaTeX .sty files
> to the vignette directory. One of these was collectbox.sty, which
> triggers the NOTE
>
> ---
>
Who is responsible for the winUCRT checks? Perhaps that person could
provide us with a list of root causes behind the testthat failures,
and we could look into resolving them.
Hadley
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 7:50 AM Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> The current CRAN release of rgl fails on winUCRT becaus
> One additional thought:
>
> If the testing package (i.e. testthat in this case) had been available
> but other suggested packages were not, it would be worth running tests
> with just testthat present: that might be why you called the decision
> defensible. I'd agree with that.
>
> However, it'
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 4:32 AM Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> I am trying out a modified version of the tidyverse actions, and it does
> seem to be going well. Just one question:
>
> rgl has a soft dependency on alphashape3d, and alphashape3d has a hard
> dependency on rgl. This means that I need to
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:27 PM Henrik Bengtsson
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> you're probably already aware of it, but 'rgl' depends on 'magrittr'
> which depends on 'rlang', and the latter requires R (>= 3.3.0).
For the reference, we support R-release, R-devel, and the last four
versions of R:
https://www
ssuming you will also use them to parse the files in the package seems
> rather less reasonable IMO when you have such a clear alternative
> (packaging).
>
> On October 3, 2020 9:02:02 AM PDT, Dirk Eddelbuettel
> wrote:
> >
> >On 3 October 2020 at 09:54, Ha
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 5:26 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 2 October 2020 at 14:44, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
> | if you want clarity in the minds of _users_ I would beg you to split the
> code into two packages. People will likely either be afraid of the GPL
> bogey man and refrain from utilizin
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 1:51 PM Ben Bolker wrote:
>
>A collaborator is arguing that it's a good idea to license one small
> component of a package under the MIT license, while the rest of it
> remains GPL >=2.
>
>Suppose this is feasible. How do I specify the license? As far as I
> can t
Is it down again? I'm seeing the same problem again.
Hadley
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 2:41 PM Hadley Wickham wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is win-builder down? I submitted a couple of packages >24 hours ago,
> and haven't heard back.
>
> Hadley
>
> --
&g
Hi all,
Is win-builder down? I submitted a couple of packages >24 hours ago,
and haven't heard back.
Hadley
--
http://hadley.nz
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 8:07 AM Georgi Boshnakov
wrote:
>
> It is worth noting that
>
> help(package="")
>
> shows file -package.Rd, while
>
> help()
>
> shows topic "package".
>
> Topic -package.Rd is also printed at the top of the pdf manual,
> while package.Rd follows the alphabetical orderin
This works for me locally too, so I'd recommend trying win-devel
again. Sometimes you catch it in an inconsistent state and your check
fails for reasons unrelated to your package.
Hadley
On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 3:50 PM Georgina Anderson
wrote:
>
> OFFICIAL
>
> Hi
>
> Any help with the following u
rs that it breaks on earlier versions, and you can't find a way to
> enable its use on earlier versions, you can add the dependency in a
> later release.
>
> Ben Bolker
>
> On 2019-07-26 10:20 a.m., Hadley Wickham wrote:
> > I no longer believe this to be good
I no longer believe this to be good advice - I think you should only
declare a specific dependency if you want to strongly assert that your
package works with those versions. For example, all tidyverse versions
depend on R 3.2 and later, because we test on all those versions.
Hadley
On Friday, Ju
how many there are, and what backgrounds they have.
Similarly, I don't want to know how much they are paid, just whether
or not they are volunteers or employees.
Hadley
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:23 AM Hadley Wickham wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Several people on my team have received response
Hi all,
Several people on my team have received responses to their CRAN
submissions from new members of the CRAN team who appear to be student
assistants (judging from their job titles: "Studentischer
administrativer Mitarbeiter"). From the outside, they appear to be
exercising editorial control[^
As of ~7 hours ago, the warning is suppressed:
https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/31ee14c620eb1b939acd322f3b5617f998aab8e8
(But the service still doesn't work)
Hadley
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:03 AM Hadley Wickham wrote:
>
> It appears that the code was added by BDR on 2 Sep 20
It appears that the code was added by BDR on 2 Sep 2018:
https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/d839b1e04e173f90b51ad809ef0bdb18095abe6f
I assume we are seeing failing R CMD check results because
http://worldclockapi.com/api/json/utc/now has recently died.
It would be appreciated if someone from
No one else has mentioned it on the thread, so I'd highly recommend
https://happygitwithr.com — it's a guide to git + github specifically
written for R users, and covers many of the common problems people
have when getting set up.
Hadley
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 2:51 AM Troels Ring wrote:
>
> Dea
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 2:48 AM Martin Maechler
wrote:
>
> >>>>> Hadley Wickham
> >>>>> on Thu, 6 Dec 2018 10:22:47 -0600 writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I'd love to get some clarification on what the new internet policy
>
You might try reinstalling devtools and dependencies - there was
unfortunately a brief combination of versions that lead to build()
failing to overwrite existing files.
Hadley
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:46 AM Wolfgang Lenhard
wrote:
>
> Many thanks for the remark. It seems, it has something to do
Can you just set _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=false?
env:
global:
# don't treat missing suggested packages as error
- _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=false
I am reasonably certain that is what CRAN uses.
Hadley
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:11 AM David Hugh-Jones
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My package Suggests a
point me to where all the policies such as this one are posted.
> This may affect a package I have, and one problem I have is different people
> have differing ideas of what defines a "graceful" exit.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Roy
>
>
> > On Dec 6, 2018, at 8:22 AM
Hi all,
I'd love to get some clarification on what the new internet policy
means for packages like httr:
> Packages which use Internet resources should fail gracefully with an
> informative
> message if the resource is not available (and not give a check warning nor
> error).
It's not clear wh
> None of these solutions seem perfect to me. I think that my suggestion is the
> most natural, but as you point out it won’t work in all contexts. Perhaps the
> safest approach is to give the vignette() command in the text of the help
> file, one of your suggestions.
If you do that, and you us
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 4:49 PM Fox, John wrote:
>
> Dear r-package-devel list members,
>
> I'd like to create a link to a package vignette from a help file in the same
> package, for example to the "partial-residuals" vignette in the effects
> package from effect.Rd. I'm able to generate a URL
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 8:14 AM L Rutter wrote:
>
> Hello all:
>
> R CMD check does not complete for my package and halts at the line "*
> checking examples ..." I suspect the halting is due to @examples
> hanging in certain R/foo.R files, where shiny::runApp() is called for
> a shiny app located
> AzureRMR: the "base" package, provides a number of R6 classes
> AzureVM: a "child" package that extends classes from AzureRMR with extra
> functionality related to virtual machines
> AzureStor: another child package that extends classes from AzureRMR, this
> time for storage accounts
> Etc.
>
>
Looking at the primary CRAN site:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/stringi/index.html, you can
see that the windows binary is still at 1.1.7, suggesting that there's
some build failure. You can see exactly what that is on the CRAN check
page: https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_resul
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 9:13 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> El vie., 7 sept. 2018 a las 16:03, Ralf Stubner
> () escribió:
> >
> > On 07.09.2018 15:52, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > > For the record, this is what the testthat paper in the R Journal says:
> > >
> > > "[...] I recommend storing your tests in inst/
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:03 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 05/09/2018 2:20 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> > I take a complementary approach; I condition on, my home-made,
> > R_TEST_ALL variable. Effectively, I do:
> >
> > if (as.logical(Sys.getenv("R_TEST_ALL", "FALSE"))) {
> > ...
> > }
> >
I'm pretty certain that seeing this warning indicates that your
`.Rbuildignore` is ignoring something that it shouldn't. You certainly
shouldn't be creating this file by hand.
Hadley
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:44 PM Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> Can you advise me about this warning in package check:
>
Does this include automatically (bot) accepted submissions?
Hadley
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 8:07 AM Uwe Ligges
wrote:
>
> Dear package developers,
>
> the CRAN incoming queue will be closed from Sep 1 to Sep 9. Hence
> package submissions are only possible before and after that period.
>
> Best,
>
I don't think it's related to the error, but you shouldn't be exporting this:
export("align<-.huxtable")
You should generally only export the method.
Hadley
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:00 AM, David Hugh-Jones
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The following shows an error for my package:
> https://www.r-projec
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 5:57 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 02/07/2018 6:13 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
>>
>> I got something similar. I have a few thoughts:
>>
>> (1) you should use "if (require(citrus)) { ... }" in your examples;
>> "Suggests" and "Enhances" packages are supposed to be *optional*, i.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:59 AM, Martin Maechler
wrote:
>> Thierry Onkelinx
>> on Fri, 20 Apr 2018 09:14:44 +0200 writes:
>
> > Dear Alex, Another idea is to use pkgdown
> > (http://pkgdown.r-lib.org) to convert all the
> > documentation of your package (include the vigne
For the purposes of CRAN submission, you should basically treat every
NOTE as an ERROR.
Hadley
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:36 AM, Gertjan van den Burg
wrote:
> While waiting to get this message posted to the list, I've solved the
> problem by copying the stdlib rand() and srand() functions into my
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 2:45 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen
wrote:
> There are 3 solutions. (1) You (get permission) to change the library to
> GPL. (2) You get permission to change the license of the R code to
> whatever license the library is released under. (3) you split the package.
For complete
Or even better, devtools::release(): it walks you through a checklist
of activities designed to make your submission as successful as
possible.
Hadley
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Georgi Boshnakov
wrote:
> You get a source package suitable for submission by running `R CMD check
> namepackag
devtools::build_win() has an unfortunate name - it's actually more
about checking your package on windows than building a package (and in
the development version we've renamed to check_win()). However,
fortunately, once your package has been accepted on CRAN, you don't
need to worry about building
> This actually is not about Rd format. Indeed, you are using 'roxygen'
> syntax.
This is unrelated to roxygen. \dontrun{} is Rd formatting.
Hadley
--
http://hadley.nz
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/list
We use this technique in a couple of places:
https://github.com/tidyverse/dbplyr/blob/6be777d8b23d588f19c98de52f4e58f16c2ef67e/R/zzz.R
Basic idea is to call registerS3method() manually, when needed - it's
just a little tricky because the suggested package may be loaded
either before or after your
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:44 AM, Bill Denney wrote:
>
>> On Dec 6, 2017, at 07:45, Joshua Ulrich wrote:
>>
>> To avoid excessive dependencies, I would like to only register
>> foo.bar() if package A is installed at the time package B is
>> installed. If package A is installed after package B, the
> If that is right -- and I tend to believe it is right -- this change had
> better been done in R core and not on package level. I think the root of
> this evil is design inconsistencies of the language together with the lack
> of removing these inconsistencies. The longer we hesitated, the more
>
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Patrick Perry wrote:
> Pro ignoring x[,1,drop=TRUE]:
> (1) it forces users to write consistent code for extracting a vector from a
> data frame
>
> Con:
> (1) functions that accept both matrices and data frames might break
> (x[[j]][i] doesn't work for a matrix)
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Joris Meys wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>>
>> > I for one am happy this discussion pops up, because it's a piece of
>> > information I give to my students as well: convert to a data.frame when
&
> I for one am happy this discussion pops up, because it's a piece of
> information I give to my students as well: convert to a data.frame when you
> start your analysis just to play safe. And this discussion shows why that is
> -for the time being!- a good advice. The moment tibbles become the def
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Patrick Perry wrote:
> Would it be possible to change tibbles so that
>
> x[,1,drop=TRUE]
>
> returns a vector, not a data frame? I certainly find it surprising that
> tibbles ignore
> the drop argument. If tibbles respeced the drop argument, then package
> develop
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Pedro J. Aphalo
wrote:
> What I think is troublesome is that data.frame is part of the definition
> of the R language, and the expectation based on R's normal behaviour is
> that testing with is.data.frame() should be enough to ensure that an
> object can be treate
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Joris Meys wrote:
> Where its parent class _sometimes_ returns an atomic vector and
>>
>> _sometimes_ returns a data frame.
>
> Indeed. And a tibble doesn't, so there's a conflict. Nobody said data.frame
> works better than tibble. Actually, we all agree that the l
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Göran Broström wrote:
> I am beginning to get complaints from users of my CRAN packages (especially
> 'eha') to the effect that they get error messages like "Error: Unsupported
> use of matrix or array for column indexing".
>
> It turns out that they are sticking i
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Joris Meys wrote:
>> > I don't like the dropping of dimensions either. That doesn't change the
>> > fact that a tibble reacts different from a data.
Just ignore it.
Hadley
On Friday, April 14, 2017, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal <
roy.mendelss...@noaa.gov> wrote:
> In my package I have a dataframe that I use but want to hide from the
> user. In Hadley's book on R Packages, he says:
>
> > • If you want to store parsed data, but not ma
I wonder if it would be useful for R CMD build to list the files it
ignores? A misspecified .Rbuildignore seems to be reasonable for a
high proportion of weird errors where you have no idea what's going
wrong.
Hadley
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 28/02/2017 10:44 A
>> A lot of packages have to work around this:
>> https://github.com/search?q=user%3Acran+R_TESTS&type=Code
>
> I wonder if those are mostly there because of cut'n'paste behavior.
It's not something I've ever advocated; I didn't realise there were so
many people unsetting it. (devtools does it for
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal
wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I am working on preparing a package for submission to CRAN, so using devtools
> i submitted the package to win-builder. I really appreciate that this has
> been setup, so that hopefully any final submission wil
One other option is to include the src for libmagic inside your
package, and use that as a fallback if it's not installed on the
system. That gives linux users what they want (linking to the system
package), and windows users what they want (it just works). It only
works for simple libraries, but i
>> It is really simple: Having _both_ Suggests: foo _and_ an unconditonal
>> call
>> to foo::bar() in the code.
>>
>> Whereas Josh and I argue that it needs to be conditional on requireNames()
>> coming back TRUE.
>
>
> I am feeling particularly dense today. What about "Having _both_ Suggests:
>
I think this sort of meta problem is best solved with svn/git because you
can easily see if the changes you think you made align with the changes you
actually made. Learning svn or git is a lot of work, but the payoff is
worth it.
Hadley
On Friday, July 22, 2016, ProfJCNash wrote:
> In trying t
if x has var in it.
>
> Thanks
>
> Russ
>
>> On Jun 27, 2016, at 9:47 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Duncan Murdoch
>> wrote:
>>> On 27/06/2016 9:22 AM, Lenth, Russell V wrote:
>>>>
>>>> My p
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 27/06/2016 9:22 AM, Lenth, Russell V wrote:
>>
>> My package 'lsmeans' is now suddenly broken because of a new provision in
>> the 'tibble' package (loaded by 'dplyr' 0.5.0), whereby the "[[" and "$"
>> methods for 'tbl_df' objects - as d
Try warningcall(R_NilValue, "message")
Hadley
On Wednesday, June 22, 2016, Aaron King wrote:
> I am in the midst of trying to improve error and warning messages in a
> complex package. I find myself wanting to modify R's default behavior when
> printing warnings. Specifically, it frequently h
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Uwe Ligges
wrote:
> I do not know devtools:
> If it worked for you for the initial submission and the CRAN team did not
> complain, please resubmit in the same way - and keep in mind you want to
> check the package in advance using a very recent version of R.
And s
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal
wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I am in the midst of some minor revisions to my xtractomatic package, which
> up till now has only been on github. Since ncdf4 for Windows is now
> available from CRAN (and many thanks to whomever is responsib
If you're using testthat, check out expect_equal_to_reference.
Hadley
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 7:45 PM, carlos cinelli
wrote:
> Do you guys have any suggestions on how to store data for unit testing?
>
> I am implementing some methods to estimate matrix entries from the
> marginals. The input of
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 08/05/2016 10:47 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8 May 2016 at 16:18, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>> | On 08.05.2016 16:13, carlos cinelli wrote:
>> | > How should I proceed in this case?
>> |
>> | Submit to CRAN.
>>
>> The deeper question
Does this help?
code <- c("BeginningBal", "Convexity", "EffConvexity", "EffDuration",
"EndingBal",
"Formula", "Horizon", "HorizonReturn", "KeyRateConvexity", "KeyRateDuration",
"KeyRateTenor", "ModDuration", "Name", "PassThroughInterest", "Period",
"PmtDate", "PrepaidPrin", "SMM", "Scheduled
rm :-)
>
> I would appreciate if you could please answer (very briefly) questions 1 to
> 3, so I can learn how to correctly document S4 generics properly in the
> future.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> 2016-03-18 15:11 GMT+01:00 Hadley Wickham :
>>
>> The problem seems to be
The problem seems to be your use of methods::setMethod instead of
setMethod (etc). Roxygen2 doesn't seem to be quite smart enough to
realise that these aren't equivalent. You might want to file an issue
on github so I look into this the next time I'm working on roxygen2.
Hadley
On Fri, Mar 18, 20
I've found that it's a very bad idea to provide length or names
methods for just this reason.
Hadley
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Nathan Wendt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have run into an issue while developing an R package. Specifically, my
> issue relates to what happens when I define an S3 lengt
You didn't include the NOTE you saw, and this isn't valid roxygen:
#' @imports methods::fields
So it's a bit hard to tell what the problem is.
Hadley
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Glenn Schultz wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I need some help understanding namespace and methods.
>
> I received a
Why not just make your own as.data.frame method? e.g.
as.data.frame.pin <- function(x, ...) {
structure(
list(x),
class = "data.frame",
row.names = .set_row_names(length(x))
)
}
data.frame() calls as.data.frame() on all of its arguments.
Hadley
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Er
Take a look at this line:
#' #' Pass through OAS engine
Hadley
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Glenn Schultz wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> When I build my package. I get the following warnings. I think these are
> related to LaTex and ElCapitan but are flowing through to my R build. All
> the tes
Here's a minimal reprex:
out <- roc_proc_text(rd_roclet(), "
#' Foo
`foo<-` <- function(x, y, value) {
UseMethod('set_labels<-')
}
#' Foo
`foo<-.default` <- function(x, y, value) {
x
}
")[[2]]
cat(format(out))
That generates
\usage{
\method{foo}{default}(x, y) <- value
}
I've also seen some problems with missing testthat on
r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64 - I'd say it's a temporary problem on the
CRAN end, and if your package is ok on win builder, you should be ok
to submit.
Hadley
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Derek Ogle wrote:
> I was hoping to submit a new ver
Hi Alex,
As far as I know, that's the best solution. In roxygen, I've wrapped
it up with a couple of helpers:
set_collate <- function(locale) {
cur <- Sys.getlocale(category = "LC_COLLATE")
Sys.setlocale(category = "LC_COLLATE", locale = locale)
cur
}
with_collate <- function(locale, code)
Why don't you just create your own function?
Hadley
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Benjamin Hofner wrote:
> Dear Gavin,
>
> unfortunately, I cannot overwrite plot.data.frame only. If I do this I
> get the following warning from R CMD check:
>
> * checking use of S3 registration ... WARNING
> Re
ata. ~ Roger Brinner
> The combination of some data and an aching desire for an answer does
> not ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given body
> of data. ~ John Tukey
>
>
> 2015-09-01 0:32 GMT+02:00 Hadley Wickham :
>> I'd recommend creating a mini
I'd recommend creating a minimal package that illustrates the problem
using an existing S4 generic in a base package (e.g. stats4::AIC).
That makes it easier to figure out what's gone wrong.
It's unlikely to be a roxygen2 problem since the translation from
@importFrom foo bar (etc) to importFrom(f
>> | Check DetailsVersion: 1.8.3
>> | Check: tests
>> | Result: ERROR
>> | Running the tests in ‘tests/stdUsage.R’ failed.
>> | Last 13 lines of output:
>> | > plot(ffTest42,col=Col,plot_GOF=TRUE,speed=T)
>> | [1] "compute goodness-of-fit with leave-one-out k-nearest
>> neighbor(
Also it's a little strange to put an RDS file _inside_ a gz, since
normally the compression is done internally.
And are you sure you should be exposing this data via a function,
rather than using the regular package data mechanism?
Hadley
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Joshua Ulrich wrote:
> O
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Kevin Ushey wrote:
> I'm not sure if that's correct -- from what I see, in the generated Rd
> documentation:
>
> - The 'usage' is drawn from the S4 generic,
> - The 'arguments' are drawn from the function.
>
> I think R CMD check is correctly warning about that.
A
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
