On 04/18/2018 10:01 PM, Iñaki Úcar wrote:
2018-04-18 22:49 GMT+02:00 Gertjan van den Burg :
Thanks for your comment. Your suggestion wouldn't solve my original problem
unfortunately, because then I'd have to reverse engineer R's RNG for my
Python package. Besides, the quality of t
same across
my packages.
Gertjan
On 04/18/2018 08:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 18 April 2018 at 11:36, Gertjan van den Burg wrote:
| While waiting to get this message posted to the list, I've solved the
| problem by copying the stdlib rand() and srand() functions into my
| package unde
submissi...@r-project.org explaining that these are false
positives, but since I haven't heard back in 10 days I don't think anyone
read that. Same thing for the submission comments (which also explained it).
The first note is:
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ‘Ger
which also explained it).
The first note is:
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ‘Gertjan van den Burg ’
New submission
Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
GenSVM (8:18, 10:61, 15:2, 16:26, 19:11)
Multiclass (4:22)
SVMs (14:25, 15:42)
misclassifications (11:49
