Re: [R-pkg-devel] new maintainer for CRAN package XML

2024-01-24 Thread Emmanuel Blondel
if XML is deprecated, then what would be the choice for a package maintainer? Move to xml2 probably at some point I assume I use XML in the R packages I've been developing. For some of them, I started before CRAN started being the maintainer, and before xml2 inception. The thing is that XML fu

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Advice for solving ERRORs in Fedora reported on CRAN / zen4R package

2020-09-03 Thread Emmanuel Blondel (GMAIL)
20 at 11:11 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 2 September 2020 at 23:59, Emmanuel Blondel (GMAIL) wrote: [...] | Your advice in order to solve that would be much appreciated, Life, as they say, "is too short" so you could just comment-out the test. Indeed, it is probably best not to ru

[R-pkg-devel] Advice for solving ERRORs in Fedora reported on CRAN / zen4R package

2020-09-02 Thread Emmanuel Blondel (GMAIL)
Dear all, I've received a notification of errors from CRAN on some package (zen4R) recently updated, being asked to fix within the 2 weeks before archiving. The error deals with 'keyring' package import at test time, on _Fedora_ flavors only. See https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_res

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Advice on setAs - issue of "in method for 'coerce' with signature / no definition for classes

2019-05-26 Thread Emmanuel Blondel (GMAIL)
clare setOldClass("ncdf4") some time prior to using setAs() . Martin On 5/24/19, 6:41 PM, "R-package-devel on behalf of Emmanuel Blondel (GMAIL)" wrote: Dear all, I write here as i'm in process to submit a revision of /geometa/ package to CRAN in which i&#x

[R-pkg-devel] Advice on setAs - issue of "in method for 'coerce' with signature / no definition for classes

2019-05-24 Thread Emmanuel Blondel (GMAIL)
Dear all, I write here as i'm in process to submit a revision of /geometa/ package to CRAN in which i've enabled some coercing methods between main metadata object ISOMetadata from geometa, and foreign metadata objects (from emld / ncdf4 packages) I've received a "pre-test archived" notificatio

[R-pkg-devel] Issue with package check on Debian, XML issue?

2018-12-16 Thread Emmanuel Blondel (GMAIL)
builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/geometa_0.4-0_20181216_165029/> The files will be removed after roughly 7 days. *** Strong rev. depends ***: geonapi ows4R Best regards, CRAN teams' auto-check service Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64 Check: CRAN in

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package submission - Issue with pandoc in R CMD check

2017-05-27 Thread Emmanuel Blondel
hields.io", we can publish > now. Otherweise, as we have not yet managed to get a univesally > working pandoc on the CRAN master, we cannot publish your package yet. > > Best, > Uwe Ligges > > > > > > On 27.05.2017 16:20, Emmanuel Blondel wrote: >> Thanks

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package submission - Issue with pandoc in R CMD check

2017-05-27 Thread Emmanuel Blondel
the CRAN team. Apparently img.shields.io have changed the cypher settings and pandoc fails with the new settings. We may have to disable *.md processing for some time. Best, Uwe Ligges On 25.05.2017 20:59, Emmanuel Blondel wrote: Dear all, I've just submitted a new package named geometa

[R-pkg-devel] Package submission - Issue with pandoc in R CMD check

2017-05-25 Thread Emmanuel Blondel
Dear all, I've just submitted a new package named geometa, for which i received the message below. Indeed i had sent in my submission some question mark about the warning i obtain during R CMD check: In case of R release and R devel, I got the following warning: Conversion of 'README.md' faile