#' @noRd
option that Zhian Kamvar mentions in my resubmission.
Thanks,
Barry
From: Boxuan Cui
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 9:32 AM
To: Eggleston, Barry
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Proper way to document helper functions not
accessible by user.
Do you ha
Hello,
I am working through my first submission and making good progress with the CRAN
review system, but now I need to understand the best practice for dealing with
helper functions. I am building a package that only exports 12 functions for
direct user access, but it has many helper function
nux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64
Check: DESCRIPTION meta-information, Result: NOTE
Thanks,
Barry
-Original Message-
From: Martin Maechler
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 11:40 AM
To: Eggleston, Barry
Cc: Roman Flury ; r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pk
Flury
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 5:27 PM
To: Eggleston, Barry
Cc: Hugh Parsonage ; r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Get an empty note for "checking DESCRIPTION
meta-information" when I run devtools::build_win()
Barry,
sorry did not anticipate the behaving
Barry
-Original Message-
From: Roman Flury
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 9:42 AM
To: Eggleston, Barry
Cc: Hugh Parsonage ; r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Get an empty note for "checking DESCRIPTION
meta-information" when I run devtools::build_win()
Hel
()} methods. Outcomes considered are Gaussian, Poisson,
Bernoulli, Lognormal, Weibull, and Piecewise Exponential.
Depends: R (>= 3.5.0)
License: GPL-3
Encoding: UTF-8
LazyData: true
Imports: eha (>= 2.5.1),
ggplot2 (>= 2.2.1),
survival (>= 2.41-3),
reshape2 (>= 1.4.3),
I am working through my first package submission. When I checked my package
using devtools::build_win(), I got no errors and two notes. One note is simply
the expected note that my package is a new submission. My second note involves
DESCRIPTION meta-information, but nothing is printed so I d
