On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Joris Meys wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I would argue that one dataset - even a new one - could be added to another
> package. The pizzapoll doesn't look like a scientific breakthrough, but it
> might be a nice dataset for teaching and/or testing new models. So I see
st.html
Barry
> I agree that to write your own license is rather daunting. I would much
> prefer to use a pre-existing license.
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> From: b.rowling...@gmail.com [mailto:b.rowling...@gmail.com] On
Chris,
you've not said what *you* would like the license for your software to do.
You could release the software under a "public domain", "no rights
reserved" style license, and then if people want to link it with
proprietary materials then nothing can stop them. But it wouldn't stop
people comme
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Thierry Onkelinx wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Some function I wrote deletes a bunch of files. It is crucial that all
> files get deleted. Hence it should return an error when one or more
> files couldn't be deleted.
>
> I'm writing a unit test for this function. I fail
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 23 May 2017 at 11:36, Spencer Graves wrote:
> | On 2017-05-23 10:56 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > A nice benefit of Gabor's CRAN mirror on GitHub is access to the GitHub.
> | > Here I constrain on user:cran (to get just that mi
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal
wrote:
> What I liked about View() is often the table is quite big, and View()
> provides scroll bars and nice headers that make it easy to look over the
> results.
When I run View(iris) I don't get scrollbars, and the table is
tr
I think that exactly what View() shows will depend on your operating
system. On my Linux box, I get a very plain spreadsheet with
everything in fixed-width font, thin black boxes, and a highlighted
cursor box. Numbers are left-justified. There's no scroll bars.
I don't know if it looks the same in
ROpenSci's onboarding process has a checkbox for confirming that the
package "does not violate the Terms of Service of any service it
interacts with.":
https://github.com/ropensci/onboarding/blob/master/issue_template.md
I also have a vague memory of this discussion a few years ago on
R-help/-dev
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
> I've found that it's a very bad idea to provide length or names
> methods for just this reason.
>> After looking
>> for memory leaks and other errors I finally noticed that the str() on the
>> object of myClass looked odd. It returned somet
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:16 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 12 October 2015 at 13:13, Charles Determan wrote:
> | Greetings,
> |
> | I have a package which provides headers for a C++ library (similar to the
> | BH package). However, the C++ library has some heavily nested components
> | with
10 matches
Mail list logo
