Re: [R-pkg-devel] DESCRIPTION file corrections for accepted package

2024-10-27 Thread Duncan Murdoch
I don't think R will enforce a 3 part version just because you used it once. You might have other reasons to try to maintain versioning consistency. Duncan Murdoch On 2024-10-27 7:48 a.m., Gianmarco Alberti wrote: Dear Duncan, Thank you for the straightforward guidance. My initial query st

Re: [R-pkg-devel] DESCRIPTION file corrections for accepted package

2024-10-27 Thread Gianmarco Alberti
Dear Duncan, Thank you for the straightforward guidance. My initial query stemmed from a concern about versioning consistency - I thought that once using three digits (1.1.1), I would need to maintain that format (e.g., 1.2.0) in future updates. Your suggestion clarified that I can use 1.1.1 for

Re: [R-pkg-devel] DESCRIPTION file corrections for accepted package

2024-10-27 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 2024-10-27 6:03 a.m., Gianmarco Alberti wrote: Dear R Package Developers, I am seeking guidance regarding a situation with my package 'chisquare' (version 1.1) on CRAN. Current situation: 1. The package was submitted and (automatically) accepted to CRAN (version 1.1) after thorough local tes

[R-pkg-devel] DESCRIPTION file corrections for accepted package

2024-10-27 Thread Gianmarco Alberti
Dear R Package Developers, I am seeking guidance regarding a situation with my package 'chisquare' (version 1.1) on CRAN. Current situation: 1. The package was submitted and (automatically) accepted to CRAN (version 1.1) after thorough local testing and complete devtools checks (check_win_oldrele