Okay, I understand now. Thank you very much for response!
Best,
Haijiang Qin
��: Uwe Ligges
�ѷ���: 2024 �� 9 �� 20 �� �� 21:58
�ռ���: �� ; r-package-devel@r-project.org
: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Why all OK but fail to the incoming checks
automatically ?
A recent issue on CRAN, we are working on fixing it.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 20.09.2024 10:46, 秦 海江 wrote:
Hi All,
I encountered an issue when submitting my R package: the incoming checks did
not report any errors, warnings, or notes, but the submission still did not
pass the incoming checks.
Hi All,
I encountered an issue when submitting my R package: the incoming checks did
not report any errors, warnings, or notes, but the submission still did not
pass the incoming checks. Here is the email I received from
lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de:
Dear maintainer,
package Qval_1.0.0.t
Thanks for the reply, Ivan. I think that 'problem solved': I just
received a message from Uwe saying that the rejection was a mistake.
Best, Göran
Den 2024-09-20 kl. 14:07, skrev Ivan Krylov:
В Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:44:44 +0200
Göran Broström пишет:
It is of course easy (but tedious) to cut t
В Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:44:44 +0200
Göran Broström пишет:
> It is of course easy (but tedious) to cut the Gordian knot by
> explicitly writing out the loops that defines 'daxpy', but is it
> necessary?
Definitely not. I think that flang will be satisfied if you provide an
explicit interface for DA
More specifically: I submitted a new version of eha to CRAN, but:
"... does not pass the incoming checks automatically,..."
I found warnings in
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/eha_2.11.5_20240919_123016/Debian/00install.out
-
/getsums.f:65:16: warning: Reference to the pro
