On 2024-08-02 10:35 a.m., Shu Fai Cheung wrote:
Hi All,
I have a function (not a method), sort_by(), in one of my packages. A
new method with the same name was introduced in the recent versions of
R (4.4.0 or 4.4.1, I forgot which one), resulting in potential
conflict in users' code.
Certainly,
On 2 August 2024 at 16:12, Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel wrote:
| В Fri, 2 Aug 2024 11:10:59 +
| Rolf Turner пишет:
|
| > The advice was to the effect that if the vignette was actually just a
| > *.tex file, one could (after putting in some preparatory code, in the
| > form of comments,
Hi All,
I have a function (not a method), sort_by(), in one of my packages. A
new method with the same name was introduced in the recent versions of
R (4.4.0 or 4.4.1, I forgot which one), resulting in potential
conflict in users' code.
Certainly, users can simply use pkg_name::function_name() to
В Fri, 2 Aug 2024 11:10:59 +
Rolf Turner пишет:
> The advice was to the effect that if the vignette was actually just a
> *.tex file, one could (after putting in some preparatory code, in the
> form of comments, before the documentclass command) pre-process the
> file (with pdflatex) and the
Some time back, in the mists of memory, I got advice (on this list, I'm
pretty sure) about building vignettes. The advice was to the effect
that if the vignette was actually just a *.tex file, one could (after
putting in some preparatory code, in the form of comments, before the
documentclass com
A vague recollections tells me this happened when the set of packages
was not fully updated.
Best,
Uwe LIgges
On 02.08.2024 09:39, Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel wrote:
В Thu, 1 Aug 2024 10:53:56 -0400
Ben Bolker пишет:
! Undefined control sequence.
l.176 \hlkwd{library}\hldef
В Thu, 1 Aug 2024 10:53:56 -0400
Ben Bolker пишет:
>! Undefined control sequence.
>l.176 \hlkwd{library}\hldef
> {(}\hlsng{"glmmTMB"}\hldef{)}
Very strange.
This may be related to https://github.com/yihui/knitr/issues/2345
(no diagnosis) and possibly https:
