Re: [R-pkg-devel] Trouble with dependencies on phyloseq and microViz

2024-05-06 Thread Simon Urbanek
Ivan, sorry if it wasn't clear, but this thread was about strong dependencies -- Sharon noted that phyloseq must remain strong dependency and asked how to deal with that (see all the parts you cut from this thread). Now that I finally have the package name I can check the details - apparently t

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Trouble with dependencies on phyloseq and microViz

2024-05-06 Thread Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel
On Tue, 7 May 2024 10:07:59 +1200 Simon Urbanek wrote: > That doesn't work - additional repositories are not allowed on CRAN > other than in very exceptional cases, because it means the package > cannot be installed by users making it somewhat pointless. I suppose that with(tools::CRAN_package_d

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Trouble with dependencies on phyloseq and microViz

2024-05-06 Thread Simon Urbanek
> On 5/05/2024, at 4:32 AM, Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel > wrote: > > В Sat, 4 May 2024 15:53:25 + > Sharon Bewick пишет: > >> I have a dependency on phyloseq, which is available through GitHub >> but not on the CRAN site. I have a similar problem with microViz, >> however I’ve manag

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Error handling in C code

2024-05-06 Thread Jarrod Hadfield
Hi, Using Rf_error() rather than error() fixed the problem. Not sure why the problem was only flagged on Debian, but it seems to have been triggered by R_NO_REMAP being defined (which will be default in R 4.5.0). Thanks for the help. Jarrod From: Simon Urbanek Date: Monday, 6 May 2024 at 03: