Simon,
On 17 November 2023 at 10:43, Simon Urbanek wrote:
| > On 17/11/2023, at 10:28 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 17 November 2023 at 09:35, Simon Urbanek wrote:
| > | can you clarify where the flags come from? The current CRAN builds
(big-sur-x86_64 and big-sur-arm64) use
| > |
| > |
Dirk,
> On 17/11/2023, at 10:28 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>
> Simon,
>
> On 17 November 2023 at 09:35, Simon Urbanek wrote:
> | can you clarify where the flags come from? The current CRAN builds
> (big-sur-x86_64 and big-sur-arm64) use
> |
> | export SDKROOT=/Library/Developer/CommandL
Simon,
On 17 November 2023 at 09:35, Simon Urbanek wrote:
| can you clarify where the flags come from? The current CRAN builds
(big-sur-x86_64 and big-sur-arm64) use
|
| export SDKROOT=/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX11.sdk
| export MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=11.0
|
| so the lowe
Dirk,
can you clarify where the flags come from? The current CRAN builds
(big-sur-x86_64 and big-sur-arm64) use
export SDKROOT=/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX11.sdk
export MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=11.0
so the lowest target is 11.0 and it is no longer forced it in the flags (so
Hi Simon,
We use C++20 'inside' our library and C++17 in the API. Part of our C++17 use
is now expanding to std::filesystem whose availability is dependent on the
implementation.
The compiler tells us (in a compilation using -mmacosx-version-min=10.14)
that the features we want are only availa
Thanks for all replies. I think the idea of a callback and link to
RcppXPtrUtils is pointing me in the right direction.
Michael Meyer
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman
