On 14/11/2023 9:38 a.m., Tomas Kalibera wrote:
I would definitely look for a work-around. In the end we want to give
users software that works, rather than something that doesn't, but
telling them, possibly with good evidence, that it is not our fault.
Fortune nomination!
Not sure if it is yet part of the --as-cran checks.
But you can set the env var
_R_CHECK_MBCS_CONVERSION_FAILURE_=true
Best,
Uwe
On 14.11.2023 17:29, Ulrike Grömping wrote:
Thank you for spotting this, I should have found it myself :-(
I suppose I don't get this error even from latest R-dev
Thank you for spotting this, I should have found it myself :-(
I suppose I don't get this error even from latest R-devel because of the
settings of my Windows system?
Best, Ulrike
Am 14.11.2023 um 17:16 schrieb Uwe Ligges:
On 14.11.2023 15:45, Ulrike Groemping wrote:
Dear package developer
On 14.11.2023 15:45, Ulrike Groemping wrote:
Dear package developers,
I am struggling with an error on R devel (all flavors) that I cannot
reproduce with a freshly installed R-devel on my machine: Function
halfnormal in package DoE.base places the greek letter alpha in the
title of a figur
Dear package developers,
I am struggling with an error on R devel (all flavors) that I cannot
reproduce with a freshly installed R-devel on my machine: Function
halfnormal in package DoE.base places the greek letter alpha in the
title of a figure. I changed the code to using plotmath about a m
On 11/13/23 19:18, Ivan Krylov wrote:
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 16:39:45 +0100 (CET)
Romain Pierlot wrote:
Here is the error message, and the adequate code part is joint in the
mail :
error:
loc("/data/gannet/ripley/R/packages/incoming/frailtypack.Rcheck/00_pkg_src/frailtypack/src/Integrale_mult_
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 10:25:03 +0100 (CET)
Romain Pierlot wrote:
> We indicated the possible bug in the comment section, with a link on
> the GitHub issue. They didn't consider this, and just refused the
> package, sending us the .log file explaining the issue on .omp
> reduction.
Sorry about that
Thanks again for your help.
>Have you tried explaining this in the package submission comment? What
>was the response? Does the reviewer need more evidence? Linking to the
>LLVM issue on GitHub and/or the previous R-package-devel thread may
>help.
We indicated the possible bug in the comment sec
