On 11/2/23 2:52 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 16:10:34 +
David Hugh-Jones wrote:
Aside from the package question, surely the other issue here is that
Prof Ripley’s email is extraordinarily rude. Any paid employee would
be sacked for that. I appreciate R and CRAN are volunte
On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 16:10:34 +
David Hugh-Jones wrote:
> Aside from the package question, surely the other issue here is that
> Prof Ripley’s email is extraordinarily rude. Any paid employee would
> be sacked for that. I appreciate R and CRAN are volunteer-run
> organisations, but I don’t th
A hack that seems to work is (whitespace added for readability):
\newcommand{\Seqn}{
\ifelse{latex}{
\Sexpr[results=rd]{if (getRversion() < "4.2.2") "eqn{#1}" else
"eqn{#2}"}
}{
\ifelse{html}{
\Sexpr[results=rd]{if (getRversion() < "4.
Aside from the package question, surely the other issue here is that Prof
Ripley’s email is extraordinarily rude. Any paid employee would be sacked
for that. I appreciate R and CRAN are volunteer-run organisations, but I
don’t think that should be an excuse for this level of, frankly, toxicity.
Why
On 2023-11-01 12:59 pm, Mikael Jagan wrote:
A hack that seems to work is (whitespace added for readability):
\newcommand{\Seqn}{
\ifelse{latex}{
\Sexpr[results=rd]{if (getRversion() < "4.2.2") "eqn{#1}" else
"eqn{#2}"}
}{
\ifelse{html
В Wed, 25 Oct 2023 13:54:53 -0700
"Reed A. Cartwright" пишет:
> For a comparison, I'd recommend looking at how GNU make does parallel
> processing. It uses the concept of job server and job slots. What I
> like about it is that it is implemented at the OS level because make
> needs to support int
В Thu, 2 Nov 2023 10:38:56 +0100 (CET)
Romain Pierlot пишет:
> Does a compiler bug imply that the issue doesn't come from from the
> code?
Yes. I'm sure (corrections welcome!) that it's not an error to use a
Fortran variable before an OpenMP parallel block that also uses it for
a reduction opera
I really appreciate your assistance, and the time you dedicated to building
LLVM !
I noticed that you've posted the issue on GitHub, thanks for this too, I'll
stay updated and regularly check the answers.
Does a compiler bug imply that the issue doesn't come from from the code?
Once again, t
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 07:58:12 +
Tony Wilkes wrote:
> pkgs.html:66:9 (pkgs.Rd:24): Warning: anchor "pkgs" already
> defined
Looks like the same problem as here:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2023q4/009790.html
Should have been fixed in SVN r85440. Unfortunately, the check mac
On 02/11/2023 3:58 a.m., Tony Wilkes wrote:
Hi everyone,
I updated my package, but found a NOTE for r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang.
See
https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang/tinycodet-00check.html.
The NOTE is:
checking HTML version of manual ... [3s/5s]
Hi everyone,
I updated my package, but found a NOTE for r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang.
See
https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang/tinycodet-00check.html.
The NOTE is:
checking HTML version of manual ... [3s/5s] NOTE
Found the following HTML validation probl
11 matches
Mail list logo
