Hi,
I know that sounds like a useless feature, but it happens that people are
better in recognising names than numbers.
And here is the question. I read in some stackexchange answers that it is
possible to add the keyword
Nickname:
to the description file. It works fine when I check the packag
Cheers Dirk and Simon for your advice, very helpful and clear.
It's certainly a complex problem, way above my experience and pay grade.
I've decided the solution for me would be to remove the dependency on Eigen
altogether, as I am only constructing and accessing sparse matrices at the
library-le
On 24 June 2023 at 21:35, Stephen Wade wrote:
| Doesnt seem like the system package is worth it. Should the convention
| simply be to bundle the headers in the package then? What about package
| size - is there some limit to the size of included libraries/headers to
| consider for CRAN?
Here is
Doesnt seem like the system package is worth it. Should the convention
simply be to bundle the headers in the package then? What about package
size - is there some limit to the size of included libraries/headers to
consider for CRAN?
On Sat, 24 June 2023, 15:08 Simon Urbanek,
wrote:
> Stephen,
>
Hi Simon,
THX for the clarification and additional work I have caused.
Helmut
Simon Urbanek wrote on 2023-06-24 06:51:
On Jun 24, 2023, at 12:19 AM, Uwe Ligges
wrote:
On 23.06.2023 11:27, Helmut Schütz wrote:
Dear all,
since a while (January?) we face NOTEs in package checks
(https://
