Re: [R-pkg-devel] Old version of rtracklayer on a single check server

2021-05-18 Thread Martin Morgan
It is wrong to say that ‘it will never be solved for R.4.0.0’. Rather, ‘it will never be a problem for R.4.0.0’. rtracklayer 1.51.5 was only ever built, checked, distributed (and installed in a correctly configured system, using the rules of install.packages and tools:::.BioC_version_associated

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Old version of rtracklayer on a single check server

2021-05-18 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
I stand corrected about the R-devel version (and now R 4.1.0) on CRAN. However, isn't it the case that it will never be solved for R 4.0.0 (to become R-oldrel on CRAN) and CRAN will keep reporting an error on MS Windows there because https://bioconductor.org/packages/3.12/bioc/html/rtracklayer.htm

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Passing CRAN checks for a package linking to a system library on CRAN machines

2021-05-18 Thread Toby Hocking
Hi Tomas, these are really helpful suggestions, which are not at all discussed in the current Writing R Extensions, nor in CRAN Repository Policy. Would you please consider adding this information to one of these official sources of documentation? On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 3:59 AM Tomas Kalibera wr

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Old version of rtracklayer on a single check server

2021-05-18 Thread Martin Morgan
That’s not correct Henrik. CRAN follows CRAN rules for installing packages, so uses tools:::BioC_version_for_R_version(). For R-devel we have > R.version.string [1] "R Under development (unstable) (2021-05-18 r80323)" > tools:::.BioC_version_associated_with_R_version() [1] '3.13' For this versi

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Old version of rtracklayer on a single check server

2021-05-18 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
It's a problem with Bioconductor and a broken release history of 'rtracklayer' on MS Windows (e.g. https://bioconductor.org/packages/3.12/bioc/html/rtracklayer.html) plus how each Bioconductor version is tied to a specific R version. In other words, even if they fix it in Bioconductor 3.13 (for R 4

[R-pkg-devel] Old version of rtracklayer on a single check server

2021-05-18 Thread Dalgleish, James (NIH/NCI) [F] via R-package-devel
To any who might have an idea: I've been reading several posts in the digest about dependency version issues on the check servers and I'm having my own issue, which I can't solve because I can't upgrade the check server's package version: * installing *source* package 'CNVScope' ... ** using sta

Re: [R-pkg-devel] InvalidUrlException for fontawesome icons in Rmarkdown vignette

2021-05-18 Thread Vincent Nijs
I see the same issue come up on rhub and the issue has also started showing up for the previous version of the package. See results link below. https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_radiant.html On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 6:10 AM Uwe Ligges wrote: > Perhaps simply ask the CRAN crew t