You should be reporting everything, the key issue here was
Check: Overall checktime, Result: NOTE
Overall checktime 23 min > 10 min
which is mainly from the vignette.
Please reduce its check time by using
- few iterations
- toy data
- and if that is not quick enough, try to provide precompute
To the best of my knowledge, new submissions always get that note, and new
submissions are handled differently, as they are given closer inspection by a
human, and since this is all-volunteer the amount of time that can take for the
code review can vary greatly. If you are greatly concerned t
Thank you for your explanation.
*-*
*Aristide Elysée HOUNDETOUNGAN*
*Ph.D. Candidate in Economics at Université Laval*
*Personal website : *www.ahoundetoungan.com
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 11:08, Ivan Krylov wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:47:37 -0500
> Elys
That's weird, I agree that there don't seem to be any issues here for
you to deal with. I would write back to CRAN (at whatever e-mail
address is suggested for correspondence, c...@r-project.org if you can't
figure it out) and ask for clarification (presumably the e-mail didn't
list any oth
Greetings,
I submitted my package CDatanet.
There was no error from Windows and Debian but just this note : "checking
CRAN incoming feasibility"
However, the package did not pass the incoming checks. My understanding was
that this note is normal and does not matter.
Here is the message I got from
On 12/02/2021 3:51 p.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 11 February 2021 at 11:30, Balasubramanian Narasimhan wrote:
| If GNU make is acceptable as a system requirement, you can get any R
| configuration/runtime variable in Makevars, e.g.
|
| R_ARCH=$(shell $(R_HOME)/bin/Rscript -e 'cat(.Platform$r
