Re: [R-pkg-devel] package problems

On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 18:57, Uwe Ligges wrote: > > On 25.04.2019 02:09, Dennis Boos wrote: > > R Package Folks, > > > > The automatic checks rejected my package submission. A year ago, I got > > past the automatic checks, but a CRAN person told me to add a doi and > > use \donttest{}. > > > > 1.

Re: [R-pkg-devel] package problems

On 25.04.2019 02:09, Dennis Boos wrote: R Package Folks, The automatic checks rejected my package submission. A year ago, I got past the automatic checks, but a CRAN person told me to add a doi and use \donttest{}. 1. So I added the doi to the DESCRIPTION file--it seems to work using the

Re: [R-pkg-devel] What constitutes insufficient merit of an r package?

I don't think this can actually be answered except by CRAN maintainers, and I would guess they will use the US Supreme Court's definition of obscenity *. I would guess that this would be used to turn down packages of interest to a very narrow

[R-pkg-devel] What constitutes insufficient merit of an r package?

Hello, When submitting a package to the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN), one requirement for eventual acceptance is novelty of the package and its workings (i.e., functions, etc.). That is, a package's contribution cannot be trivial. The flowchart found here explains things pictorially:

Re: [R-pkg-devel] package problems

Hi Dennis, I On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 9:00 AM Dennis Boos wrote: > > R Package Folks, > > The automatic checks rejected my package submission. A year ago, I got > past the automatic checks, but a CRAN person told me to add a doi and > use \donttest{}. > > 1. So I added the doi to the DESCRIPTION

[R-pkg-devel] package problems

R Package Folks, The automatic checks rejected my package submission. A year ago, I got past the automatic checks, but a CRAN person told me to add a doi and use \donttest{}. 1. So I added the doi to the DESCRIPTION file--it seems to work using the cran checks in Rstudio and everything looks