Dear Thomas,
Yes, I followed all those suggestions but it did not fix the x64 notes.
Indeed I am using Windows. I am going to try this on a Linux system.
Cheers, Rampal
On 10-Apr-18 14:17, Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Hi,
I assume you followed "Writing R Extension" and the examples given in
pac
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 2:45 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen
wrote:
> There are 3 solutions. (1) You (get permission) to change the library to
> GPL. (2) You get permission to change the license of the R code to
> whatever license the library is released under. (3) you split the package.
For complete
I'm not a lawyer, but I don't see why the entire package can't be
released under GPL, while also respecting the QHull license for the
QHull code and the derived QHull portions.
Many existing R packages released under GPL, and R itself, include BSD
and MIT licensed code.
The QHull license is a ver
Hi,
I assume you followed "Writing R Extension" and the examples given in
package deSolve (and maybe some other packages).
Am I right that this fixed the i386 notes, but not for x64?
Here I conclude that you tested it on Windows. This is relevant, because
I remember a recent discussion (mayb
Dear all,
I am using Fortran code with the deSolve package in my package called
"DDD". When checking my package I get the message:
checking compiled code ... NOTE
File 'DDD/libs/x64/DDD.dll':
Found no calls to: 'R_registerRoutines', 'R_useDynamicSymbols'
It is good practice to register native
There are 3 solutions. (1) You (get permission) to change the library to
GPL. (2) You get permission to change the license of the R code to
whatever license the library is released under. (3) you split the package.
You have investigated (1) and it does not work. I would suggest thinking
about
