In fact, the reason for rejection is just after the 'misspelled' words:
>The Title field should be in title case, current version then in title case:
'>Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-valued Symbolic
Data'
>'Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric and Interval-V
Ok, my fault sorry:
This is the original message for current submission from prof. Ligges
---
Dear maintainer,
package mdsOpt_0.3-1.tar.gz does not pass the incomin
On 05/04/2018 4:41 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
I think it was reasonable to post this to the list for discussion --
it's good not to bother the CRAN maintainers unnecessarily. At this
point it might be more productive to e-mail them (CRAN maintainers)
for clarification: e.g., explain your interpretati
I think it was reasonable to post this to the list for discussion --
it's good not to bother the CRAN maintainers unnecessarily. At this
point it might be more productive to e-mail them (CRAN maintainers)
for clarification: e.g., explain your interpretation of what they're
asking you to do and giv
My understanding is that CRAN asks for references in the description field when
they feel that it would not be very clear what the package is about.
As to the possibly mis-spelled words, jus mention in the submission that you
think they are ok, surely there is no need to put author names inquir
On 05/04/2018 4:17 PM, Dudek Andrzej wrote:
CRAN maintainers rejected the package two times already due to this note
But for previous version I've been asked to add the references in description
field:
Package Information:
Package: mdsOpt
Version: 0.1-4
Title: Searching for Optimal MDS Proced
IMHO citation info is something completely different. I’ve been asked to add
references in description field by CRAN maintainers
> Package Information:
> Package: mdsOpt
> Version: 0.1-4
> Title: Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric Data
> Author(s): Marek Walesiak Andrzej Dudek
I don't think your DESCRIPTION file is properly formed. See
http://r-pkgs.had.co.nz/description.html for more information. Author fields
in particular are done in a particular way.
HTH,
-Roy
> On Apr 5, 2018, at 1:17 PM, Dudek Andrzej wrote:
>
> CRAN maintainers rejected the package two
CRAN maintainers rejected the package two times already due to this note
But for previous version I've been asked to add the references in description
field:
> Package Information:
> Package: mdsOpt
> Version: 0.1-4
> Title: Searching for Optimal MDS Procedure for Metric Data
> Author(s): Marek
I may be wrong, but I have "mis-spelled" words in my submissions. When you
submit to CRAN, I am pretty certain the spell-check is automated by a
spell-checker, adn if those words aren't recognized they will throw the note.
Try creating a cran-comments.md file, and put into that everything yo
Why not remove the references and instead put them in the package citation
info?
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 at 20:35, Dudek Andrzej wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've stuck in submitting new version of package(mdsOpt), due to the
> following note,
>
> Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
> De (13:2)
>
Can you clarify what "which cause the rejection at submission process"
means, i.e. have the CRAN maintainers already rejected your package
because of this note, or are you afraid they will?
Looking at
https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-exts.html#The-DESCRIPTION-file
, I agree that there's n
Hello,
I've stuck in submitting new version of package(mdsOpt), due to the following
note,
Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
De (13:2)
Diday (14:48)
Groenen (12:13, 14:2)
Leeuw (13:5)
Mair (12:30, 13:16)
Walesiak (15:2, 16:2)
Winsberg (14:19)
which cause the rejection at
13 matches
Mail list logo
