I must have missed the bit where anyone mentioned Title Case.
CRAN's rules are definitely solid the vast majority of the time, and I've
opted for a GitHub/devtools based release.
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 18 April 2016 at 20:48, boB Rudis wrote:
> | So, how do
Short answer: use the R macro ISNAN instead. See the Writing R
Extensions manual for details.
Long answer: The default standard for C++ code in R packages is C++98,
which does not define a function "isnan". The C++11 standard introduced
a std::isnan function to C++. What you were previously gettin
On 20 April 2016 at 14:28, Antonio Canale wrote:
| Dear all,
|
| my problem is related to the new version of my msBP package but it
| actually applies also to the current version uploaded on CRAN
| (https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_msBP.html).
|
| It turns out that the package
On 18 April 2016 at 20:48, boB Rudis wrote:
| So, how do we create a solid alternative to CRAN? github drat wld have
| been impossible at my previous gig (for good reasons). Is it time to
| try to get rOpenSci to be a legit CRAN alternative? Add enough process
| around it to support things like th
Dear all,
my problem is related to the new version of my msBP package but it
actually applies also to the current version uploaded on CRAN
(https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_msBP.html).
It turns out that the package cannot be compiled under the new R-devel
for windows.
The prob
