2008 2:44 PM
An: Duncan Murdoch
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Betreff: Re: [R] unexpected GAM result - at least for me!
Hi,
I've compared observed and predicted and they match 100%.
For 90% probability of occurrence:
table(can>0,fitted(can3.gam)>0.9)
FALSE TRUE
FALSE
ll the help,
Monica
> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:30:01 -0400
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R] unexpected GAM result - at least for me!
>
> On 3/31/2008 9:01 AM, Monica Pisica wrote:
>> Thanks Duncan.
>
met.)
Duncan Murdoch
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Monica
>
> > Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 08:47:48 -0400
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > CC: r-help@r-project.org
> > Subject: Re: [R] unexpected GAM result - at least for me!
&g
predict presence / absence.
Do you think it is still a valid result?
Thanks again,
Monica> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 08:47:48 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: r-help@r-project.org> Subject: Re: [R] unexpected GAM
result - at least for me!> > On 3/31
On 3/31/2008 8:34 AM, Monica Pisica wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>
> I am afraid i am not understanding something very fundamental and does
> not matter how much i am looking into the book "Generalized Additive Models"
> of S. Wood i still don't understand my result.
>
> I am trying to model presenc
5 matches
Mail list logo
