Re: [R] help in fitted values in lm function

2011-11-14 Thread Timothy Bates
on. > > Bill Dunlap > Spotfire, TIBCO Software > wdunlap tibco.com > >> -Original Message- >> From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On >> Behalf Of arunkumar1111 >> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 3:36 AM >> To: r-hel

Re: [R] help in fitted values in lm function

2011-11-14 Thread William Dunlap
> From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On > Behalf Of arunkumar > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 3:36 AM > To: r-help@r-project.org > Subject: Re: [R] help in fitted values in lm function > > Yes there are few NA in the Data > >

Re: [R] help in fitted values in lm function

2011-11-14 Thread arunkumar1111
Yes there are few NA in the Data -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/help-in-fitted-values-in-lm-function-tp4038642p4039207.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list ht

Re: [R] help in fitted values in lm function

2011-11-14 Thread Petr PIKAL
Hi > > Hi, > > I have a data set of 1 rows and ran a linear regression by using the > function lmres = lm(formula,data) > > then got the fitted value by using the value fit=fitted(lmres). > > but the number of rows in the fitted one is about 9548, > > What could be the reason for reductio