Re: [R] easy debugging

> "ycw" == ying chen wang > on Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:10:24 -0400 writes: ycw> Yes, thanks. Just found out the solution. Thanks for the help. ycw> Just started R. Not familiar with its environment. ycw> G ycw> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:08 PM, jim holtman wrote: >

Re: [R] easy debugging

Yes, thanks. Just found out the solution. Thanks for the help. Just started R. Not familiar with its environment. G On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:08 PM, jim holtman wrote: > Is this what you want: > > > equated<-c(111.0,112.06, 112.9, 113.8, 115.0, 116.2, 117.0, 118.0, 120.5, > + 120.5, 120.5) > >

Re: [R] easy debugging

Thanks, it works. I found out the solution a moment ago. The 2nd one works. But, the weird thing is that if I use 'x', it works. If I use 'equated', it didn't work. Not sure why. Thanks again. G On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Joshua Wiley wrote: > What about these two options? > > #One way >

Re: [R] easy debugging

What about these two options? #One way ifelse(equated > 120, 120, equated) #Another way equated[equated > 120] <- 120 HTH, Josh On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:26 AM, ying_chen wang wrote: > I am new to R. Used to use FORTRAN. R is so different from FORTRAN. The > following codes would work in FOT

Re: [R] easy debugging

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:06 PM, ying_chen wang wrote: > Thanks, it works. I found out the solution a moment ago. The 2nd one works. > > But, the weird thing is that if I use 'x', it works. If I use 'equated', it > didn't work. Not sure why. What is 'x' ? > > Thanks again. > > G > > On Mon, Jul

Re: [R] easy debugging

Is this what you want: > equated<-c(111.0,112.06, 112.9, 113.8, 115.0, 116.2, 117.0, 118.0, 120.5, + 120.5, 120.5) > equated[equated > 120] <- 120 > equated [1] 111.00 112.06 112.90 113.80 115.00 116.20 117.00 118.00 120.00 120.00 120.00 > You should read up on 'indexing' in the R Intro paper.