I just did a search on StructTS on the same topic and ended up here. Did
this issue ever get resolved here or elsewhere?
Regards,
Myron
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/StructTS-standard-errors-tp966079p1460216.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
e parameter.
>
> --
> David Winsemius
>
>>
>> Best,
>> Giovanni
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: David Winsemius
>> Date: Monday, December 21, 2009 3:50 pm
>> Subject: Re: [R] StructTS standard errors
>>
>>> Alterna
semius
Date: Monday, December 21, 2009 3:50 pm
Subject: Re: [R] StructTS standard errors
Alternate hypotheses:
HA1: There is no one in the readership who is familiar with the
function (unlikely), or among those lacking knowledge of what
package
it might reside in (such as myself) chose not
en to be variances.
(Incidentally, I know how to take square roots in R)
Best,
Giovanni
- Original Message -
From: David Winsemius
Date: Monday, December 21, 2009 3:50 pm
Subject: Re: [R] StructTS standard errors
> Alternate hypotheses:
>
> HA1: There is no one in the
Alternate hypotheses:
HA1: There is no one in the readership who is familiar with the
function (unlikely), or among those lacking knowledge of what package
it might reside in (such as myself) chose not to look up what you
might have provided on the first posting: a self-contained example t
Sorry for asking again, but I did not receive any answers - I know it's a busy
time... ;-)
Shell I conclude that it is not possible to obtain standard errors from
StructTS()
or its output?
Thanks,
Giovanni Petris
- Original Message -
From: Giovanni Petris
Date: Thursday, December 17,
6 matches
Mail list logo