Re: [R] Regression and Sub-Groups Analysis in Metafor

2016-05-31 Thread Dan Kolubinski
Thank you, Bert. That's perfect! I will do. On 31 May 2016 21:43, "Bert Gunter" wrote: > Briefly, as this is off-topic, and inline: > Bert Gunter > > "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along > and sticking things into it." > -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "B

Re: [R] Regression and Sub-Groups Analysis in Metafor

2016-05-31 Thread Bert Gunter
Briefly, as this is off-topic, and inline: Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Dan Kolubinski wrote: > That makes per

Re: [R] Regression and Sub-Groups Analysis in Metafor

2016-05-31 Thread Dan Kolubinski
That makes perfect sense. Thank you, Michael. I take your point about not chasing the data and definitely see the risks involved in doing so. Our hypothesis was that the first, second and fourth variables would be significant, but the third one (intervention) would not be. I will double-check t

Re: [R] Regression and Sub-Groups Analysis in Metafor

2016-05-31 Thread Michael Dewey
In-line On 30/05/2016 19:27, Dan Kolubinski wrote: I am completing a meta-analysis on the effect of CBT on low self-esteem and I could use some help regarding the regression feature in metafor. Based on the studies that I am using for the analysis, I identified 4 potential moderators that I wan