Haha, true true! ;)
It was to be used as a measure on how good the models I use are, but I found
out that the AIC would be much easier to implement, and as I understand, a
better measure of how good the model fit.
Thanks,
Chris
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/R-
On 18/07/13 02:36, Chris89 wrote:
Dear users,
I want to compute r-squared values from a glm regression using a gamma
distribution and an "identity" link-function, but find no such thing when
using the summary() or names() function. My next guess was to calculate it
by "hand", i.e.
r2 = (sum((es
2 matches
Mail list logo