At 8:17 AM -0400 3/31/09, John Fox wrote:
Dear TY,
Considering that you used different methods -- maximum-likelihood factor
analysis in R and principal components analysis in SAS -- the results are
quite similar (although the three rotated factors/components come out in
different orders).
I hop
As it was already pointed out by others, you used different methods
(principal components in SAS vs. factor analysis in R). When you use the
same method (+ varimax rotation) in both programs, there may still be a
*small* difference: this comes from (possibly) different stopping criteria.
In R, the
Dear TY,
Considering that you used different methods -- maximum-likelihood factor
analysis in R and principal components analysis in SAS -- the results are
quite similar (although the three rotated factors/components come out in
different orders).
I hope this helps,
John
> -Original Message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> I ran factor analysis using R and SAS. However, I had different outputs from
> R and SAS.
> Why they provide different outputs? Especially, the factor loadings are
> different.
> I did real dataset(n=264), however, I had an extremely different f
4 matches
Mail list logo