Re: [R] Different PCA results under Windows and Linux

2008-09-17 Thread Mark Difford
Hi Jathine, And then to see things more clearly still, you can do something like this on your test results: format(formatC(p1$var$coord, digits=15, format="f"), justify="right") and format(formatC(p1$var$coord, digits=16, format="f"), justify="right") Though I do hope that the second command

Re: [R] Different PCA results under Windows and Linux

2008-09-17 Thread jathine
Thank you for your reply. Here are some more info, I hope this can explain the problem a bit more clearly. Why PCA gives different results on the two different platforms? freqtest.txt file line text : M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 -1 -1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 0 0

Re: [R] Different PCA results under Windows and Linux

2008-09-17 Thread Mark Difford
Hi Jathine, >> I hope this can explain the problem a bit more clearly. >> Why PCA gives different results on the two different platforms? What is amazing, Jathine, is how nearly exactly identical the two sets of results are, not that they begin to differ at the 16th decimal place. To assuage yo

Re: [R] Different PCA results under Windows and Linux

2008-09-17 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Steven McKinney wrote: > Not likely that anyone can explain, as > there is not enough information in your > email. > > Including the contents of the freqtest.txt file > was a good idea, as the posting guide suggests > (the posting guide is that clearly labeled bit > at the bottom that looks like th

Re: [R] Different PCA results under Windows and Linux

2008-09-16 Thread Steven McKinney
Not likely that anyone can explain, as there is not enough information in your email. Including the contents of the freqtest.txt file was a good idea, as the posting guide suggests (the posting guide is that clearly labeled bit at the bottom that looks like this: PLEASE do read the posting guide