Re: [R] Arguments to utils:::menuInstallPkgs

Sent from Mail for Windows 10 [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do re

Re: [R] arguments imply differing number of rows

Thank you Bob, this is what i was looking for. Really appreciate. Regards, Shivi On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Bob O'Hara wrote: > 4000:6000 gives you 4000, 4001, ..., 6000. I suspect you want > population= c(seq(4000, 6000, length=5), seq(3500, 4300, length=5), > seq(3000, 3200, length=5))

Re: [R] arguments imply differing number of rows

Hello, Just count: city is 3*5 == 15, population is length(4000:6000) + length(3500:4300) + length(3000:3200) == 2001 + 801 + 201 == 3003 Hope this helps, Rui Barradas Citando Shivi Bhatia : Hi Team, I using the syntax as: data.df<- data.frame( city= c(rep(c("Delhi",

Re: [R] arguments imply differing number of rows

What do you think 4000:6000 means? Perhaps you need to spend time with an R tutorial or two and stop searching google. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom C

Re: [R] arguments imply differing number of rows

4000:6000 gives you 4000, 4001, ..., 6000. I suspect you want population= c(seq(4000, 6000, length=5), seq(3500, 4300, length=5), seq(3000, 3200, length=5)) Bob On 20 September 2017 at 17:07, Shivi Bhatia wrote: > Hi Team, > > I using the syntax as: > > data.df<- data.frame( > city= c(rep(c("D

Re: [R] Arguments imply differing number of rows: 1, 0

Hi, John, see inline. Am 27.03.2017 um 20:47 schrieb John Murtagh: Hi All, I am trying to generate a cdf plot by using ggplot and have looked at some examples online. However when I try to replicate it I get the following error: "arguments imply differing number of rows: 1, 0" I made a searc

Re: [R] Arguments to utils:::menuInstallPkgs

OK, many thanks Duncan! ///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\///\\\ Jose Claudio Faria Estatistica UESC/DCET/Brasil joseclaudio.faria at gmail.com Telefones: 55(73)3680.5545 - UESC 55(73)99966.9100 - VIVO 55(73)99100.7351 - TIM 55(73)98817.6159 - OI 55(73)98129.9942 - CLARO ///\\\///\\\///\\\

Re: [R] Arguments to utils:::menuInstallPkgs

On 09/04/2016 8:14 AM, Jose Claudio Faria wrote: Dears, Is it possible (in any viable way) to pass arguments to the base function (install.packages I think) using the utils:::menu? No, but why not just call install.packages directly? (If you are using Rgui in Windows, you can add menu items

Re: [R] Arguments in functions when packaging

On 14-01-28 2:48 AM, Eva Prieto Castro wrote: Hi everybody, I have a doubt in relation with arguments in functions when packaging: Does it make sense the fact of having dots as an argument when it is the only argument?. I mean you have a package and a function that will be used directly by the

Re: [R] arguments in merge() not accepted

What is? str(data1) str(data2) The man page actually states that the data.frame method of the generic merge() has that argument, but it is not guaranteed that other methods will have the same argument list. (read ?UseMethod if that sentence doesn't make sense) In fact, I know xts/zoo don't. Mich

Re: [R] Arguments to order()

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 11-04-23 2:00 PM, David Neu wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> The rows of a data frame can be sorted lexicographically as shown in >> this example, >> >> my.df<- data.frame(x=c(1,1,1,2,2), y=c(1,2,3,2,1)) >> my.df[order(my.df$x,my.df$y, decreasing=T

Re: [R] Arguments to order()

On 11-04-23 2:00 PM, David Neu wrote: Hi, The rows of a data frame can be sorted lexicographically as shown in this example, my.df<- data.frame(x=c(1,1,1,2,2), y=c(1,2,3,2,1)) my.df[order(my.df$x,my.df$y, decreasing=TRUE), ] however, I'm wondering if it's possible to pass a variable in as the

Re: [R] Arguments of a function

Thank you very much! -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Arguments-of-a-function-tp3387643p3388615.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailma

Re: [R] Arguments of a function

?do.call ## read it CAREFULLY, please. do.call(runif,as.list(c(1,range))) -- Bert On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Lisa wrote: > Hi, everybody, > > I just want to pass arguments to a function as below: > > range <- c(0.1, 0.5) > > runif(1, range) > > But it doesn’t work. > > Does anyone have a

Re: [R] Arguments of a function

You need to change your second line: range <- c(0.1, 0.5) runif(1, range[1], range[2]) -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Arguments-of-a-function-tp3387643p3388400.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

Re: [R] Arguments in functions

Paul - Please take a look at the help file for boot, i.e. type ?boot at the R prompt. There you will see, along with other information: statistic: A function which when applied to data returns a vector containing the statistic(s) of interest. When ‘sim="parametric"’

Re: [R] arguments must have the same length

It's not night time everywhere. The error message suggests that your arguments have different lengths, and that this is required. Perhaps a function that takes two vector arguments? Please provide the code you are running, hopefully with a reproducible example as per the posting guide. BTW, plea

Re: [R] Arguments of a function

Normally one designs their function to input a formula in such a case rather than design it to take the names directly. Thus: f <- function(formula = ~ x1 + x2) { xs <- c(x1 = 1, x2 = exp(1), x3 = 2*pi) v <- all.vars(formula) stopifnot(length(v) == 2, all(v %in% names(xs))) sum(xs[v]) }

Re: [R] Arguments of a function

You could define a list and then just access the appropriate elements of that list: my.f <- function(a, b) { x1 = equation 1 x2 = equation 2 x3 = equation 3 L <- list(x1, x2, x3) y <- L[[a]] + L[[b]] } my.f(1,2) my.f(2,3) -Peter Ehlers Lisa wrote: Dear all, I have a question about

Re: [R] Arguments of a function

On 01/09/2010 05:15 AM, Lisa wrote: Dear all, I have a question about how to set arguments in my own function. For example, I have a function that looks like this: my.f<- function(a = x1, b = x2) { x1 = equation 1 x2 = equation 2 x3 = equation 3 y = a + b } x1, x2, and x3 are t

Re: [R] Arguments of a function

That's what I want. Thank you so much. Lisa Henrique Dallazuanna wrote: > > Try this: > > my.f <- function(a, b) { > x1 <- 2 * 3 > x2 <- 3 / 6 > x3 <- 4 * 4 / 5 - sqrt(2) > y <- get(deparse(substitute(a))) + get(deparse(substitute(b))) > return(y) > } > > my.f(x

Re: [R] Arguments of a function

Try this: my.f <- function(a, b) { x1 <- 2 * 3 x2 <- 3 / 6 x3 <- 4 * 4 / 5 - sqrt(2) y <- get(deparse(substitute(a))) + get(deparse(substitute(b))) return(y) } my.f(x1, x2) On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Lisa wrote: > > Dear all, > > I have a question about

Re: [R] Arguments

See ?commandArgs Also the getopt and optparse CRAN packages. On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:20 AM, yonosoyelmejor wrote: > > hello,I would like to ask a question,Is there any way to pass arguments to a > script?I have this code: > > Invernadero<-read.table(file.choose(),header=T,sep=",") > > attach(In

Re: [R] Arguments for Plot()

On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:18:34 +0200 Tal Galili wrote: > Do you mean maybe: > > plot(x, ylim= range(x) ) Also, the various plot arguments are listed in ?plot.default It may be a bit confusing that they're not listed in ?plot but the help page *does* have a link to the help page for 'plot.default

Re: [R] Arguments for Plot()

Do you mean maybe: plot(x, ylim= range(x) ) ? -- My contact information: Tal Galili E-mail: tal.gal...@gmail.com Phone number: 972-52-7275845 FaceBook: Tal Galili My Blogs: http://www.talgalili.com (Web and general, Hebrew) http://www.biostatistics

Re: [R] Arguments for Rcmd BATCH

-project.org Subject: RE: [R] Arguments for Rcmd BATCH I suggested you use Rscript, please do. R CMD BATCH is the Unix-alike notation. Rcmd BATCH is the recommended way on Windows, but R CMD BATCH is also accepted. There is nothing to reproduce here, so here is a simple example. tystie% cat foo.R args

Re: [R] Arguments for Rcmd BATCH

Hicks -Original Message- From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk] Sent: 10 January 2009 18:18 To: Andrew Hicks Cc: r-help@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] Arguments for Rcmd BATCH Your R is far too old, and in particular too old for the example you are trying. Please do

Re: [R] Arguments for Rcmd BATCH

orry to impose on you but guess I am still doing something wrong. I have looked through the documentation but cannot find much on this or many examples. Many thanks, Andrew Hicks -Original Message- From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk] Sent: 10 January 2009 18:18

Re: [R] Arguments for Rcmd BATCH

Your R is far too old, and in particular too old for the example you are trying. Please do you as asked in the posting guide to do before posting, and upgrade. Then you will have Rscript, as described in the current 'An Introduction to R' manual for this purpose (with examples). On Sat, 10

Re: [R] Arguments to lm() within a function - object not found

Thanks very much for the quick reply. I had looked at the help for lm, but I clearly skimmed over the critical part explaining where weights is evaluated. Thanks, Pete On 13/8/2008, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: >On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Pete Berlin wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm having some difficulty

Re: [R] Arguments to lm() within a function - object not found

On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Pete Berlin wrote: Hi all, I'm having some difficulty passing arguments into lm() from within a function, and I was hoping someone wiser in the ways of R could tell me what I'm doing wrong. I have the following: lmwrap <- function(...) { wts <- somefunction() print(wts)

Re: [R] Arguments become nonnumeric

Several different ways. You can look in the Intro to R to learn more: > my.list <- list(a=matrix(1:9,3), b=1:4, c="this is a string", d=list(1,2,3)) > my.list $a [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,]147 [2,]258 [3,]369 $b [1] 1 2 3 4 $c [1] "this is a string" $d $d[[1]

Re: [R] Arguments become nonnumeric

Thank you, this seems promissing. How can I address then a certain element e.g. to add the second and the third component? Faithfully, Mag. Ferri Leberl Am Sonntag, den 09.12.2007, 07:11 -0800 schrieb jim holtman: > You program contains: > > de.dd<-c("Dresden",51,2,13,44) > > and since you are

Re: [R] Arguments become nonnumeric

Meant to say coerced to "character". See "?c" On Dec 9, 2007 6:14 AM, Mag. Ferri Leberl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Everybody, > Enclosed are the tiny beginning of a program and its output. > As a pity, if I load the image the elements of > are non numerical; returns de.dd[2] + de.dd[3]

Re: [R] Arguments become nonnumeric

You program contains: de.dd<-c("Dresden",51,2,13,44) and since you are mixing characters with numerics and putting them into a single vector, the data is coerced to a common data type, which in this case is numeric. What are you trying to do? Do you want to use a list? > de.dd [1] "Dresden" "5

Re: [R] Arguments to "personalised" plot()

On 07-Oct-07 21:51:29, Rolf Turner wrote: > > On 8/10/2007, at 10:01 AM, Deepayan Sarkar wrote: >>[...] >> I'm not sure exactly which part you didn't expect. Given this >> definition of plotb, I would expect >> >> plotb(x,cos(x)) >> >> to expand to >> >> plot(x, pch="+", col="blue", cos(x)) >> >>

Re: [R] Arguments to "personalised" plot()

On 8/10/2007, at 10:01 AM, Deepayan Sarkar wrote: > On 10/7/07, Ted Harding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Folks, >> >> I'm curious for an explanation of the following -- it's a >> matter of trying to understand how R parses it. >> >> I've written sundry little "helper" variants of functions, >

Re: [R] Arguments to "personalised" plot()

On 07-Oct-07 21:01:08, Deepayan Sarkar wrote: > On 10/7/07, Ted Harding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Folks, >> >> I'm curious for an explanation of the following -- it's a >> matter of trying to understand how R parses it. >> >> I've written sundry little "helper" variants of functions, >> in p

Re: [R] Arguments to "personalised" plot()

On 10/7/07, Ted Harding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I'm curious for an explanation of the following -- it's a > matter of trying to understand how R parses it. > > I've written sundry little "helper" variants of functions, > in particular plot(), to save repetitively typing the same